Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University Magnitogorsk, Russia:

T. V. Kozlova, Cand. Econ., head of the Chair of Accounting and Economical Analysis, e-mail: twkozlova@mail.ru
E. S. Zambrzhitskaya, Cand. Econ., Associate Prof., Chair of Accounting and Economical Analysis, e-mail: jenia-v@yandex.ru
Ya. D. Balbarin, Post-Graduate, Chair of Accounting and Economical Analysis, e-mail: ydbalbarin@gmail.com

The cost price calculation is not the only research object of accounting, but becomes the object of management accounting and the legislative object in case of economic entities. The necessity of cost price calculation tightly linked to the estimation of economic activity effectiveness (for the definition of financial result and ways to improve it). When we have such phenomenon as a state defense order the cost price calculation becomes more significant — because state and firm are found in a particular contract, a priori being in unequal conditions. On the one hand, the state has all the advantages, because it fixes the norms of its behavior legislatively, on the other hand — the firm, as a subject of the economy, can not be significantly discriminated. The subject of this article was the examination of the relationship between the state and the firm on the issue of costing in the framework of state defense order, as well as determining the most effective calculation methodology that respects the balance of interests of all parties.

1. Malyi V. Yu. Influence of the state policy on development of small metallurgical works and territories of their location. Chernye Metally. 2016. No. 12. pp. 39–46.
2. Federal law dated 29.12.2012 No. 275-ФЗ «On the state defense procurement». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140175/ (accessed: 13.12.2018).
3. Oder of the RF Ministry of the Industry and Power Engineering dated 23.08.2006 № 200 «On approval of the order of determination of expenses content for manufacture of products with defense destination according to the State defense procurement». Available at: http://legalacts.ru/doc/prikaz-minpromenergo-rf-ot-23082006-n-200/ (accessed: 13.12.2018 ).
4. Ghioreanu D., Ille A. Are the expenses expedient? Chernye Metally. 2016. No. 4. pp. 66–69.
5. Zatsepin V. Parallel reality of the state defense order. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2013. Vol. 20, No. 11. pp. 52–54.
6. Koske M. S., Mishuchkova Yu. G. Expenditures in Russian accounting: economical sense and normative consolidation. Mezhdunarodny bukhgaltersky uchet. 2015. No. 32. pp. 51–63.
7. Decision of the RF Government № 47 dated January 19, 1998. «On the rules of operating of separate accounting the results of financial and economical activities by the organizations implementing the State procurement at the expense of the Federal budget». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_17542/ (accessed: 13.12.2018).
8. Krivonogova I. V. Effect of the state defense order on the stimulation of the economic growth in Russia. Dvoynye tekhnologii. 2014. No. 2. pp. 55–57.
9. Drury C. Management and cost accounting, 10^th edn. CENGAGE Learning. 2018. 816 p.
10. Eaton G. Management Accounting Official Terminology. CIMA Publishing. 2005. 156 p.
11. Kaplan R. S., Atkinson A. A. Advanced management accounting, Prentice-Hall. 1998. 768 p.
12. Noreen E., Smith D., Mackey J. The theory of constraints and its implications for management accounting. NY. : North River Press. 1995. 187 p.
13. Baskakova N. T., Yakobson Z. V., Simakov D. B. Strategic milestones in management of expenses in the system of technical maintenance and repair of metallurgical equipment. Chernye Metally. 2017. No. 2. pp. 73–78.
14. Gnennaya А. N. Structure, order of accounting and distribution on calculation objects of general operating and economic expenses. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2015. No. 1. pp. 29–32.
15. Zeman R., Vokhozka М., Zambrzhitskaya Е. S., Ivanova N. Е., Pikhova R., Popilkova М., Kabourkova К. Management accounts: tutorial. Magnitogorsk: Izdatelstvo Magnitogorskogo gosudarstvennogo technicheskogo universiteta im. G. I. Nosova. 2015. 223 p.
16. Tsvetkov P. S., Vasiltsova V. M., Lobanov N. Ya. System for distribution of costs as the basis for management decision making. Zapiski gornogo instituta. 2013. Vol. 206. pp. 204–208
17. Zambrzhitskaia E. S., Ivanova N. Ye., Ivanov V. G., Kobeleva I. V., Balbarin Ya. D. Distribution of indirect costs on the basis on the matrix approach (as exemplified by CHP plant of cogenerated type). Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 9. Iss. 14. p. 91081.
18. Voynova E. S., Nechaev I. A. Improvement of production price calculation on the basis of the matrix approach. Aktualnye problemy sovremennoy nauki, tekhniki i obrazovaniya. 2011. No. 2. pp. 287–289.
19. Voynova E. S., Khudyakov А. А. Improvement of production price calculation on the basis of the iterative approach. Aktualnye problemy sovremennoy nauki, tekhniki i obrazovaniya. 2011. No. 2. pp. 281–283.
20. Zambrzhitskaya Е. S., Balbarin Ya. D. Problematics of indirect costs in metallurgy at the presence of counter materials flows. In the collection: Prom-Inzhiniring proceedings of the II International scientific and technical conference, South Ural State University. 2016. pp. 514–518.
21. Zambrzhitskaya Е. S., Balbarin Ya. D., Danilenko N. I. Matrix approach to indirect costs distribution and formation of overall production price. Mezhdunarodny bukhgaltersky uchet. 2015. No. 16(358). pp. 48–60.