Journals →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2021 →  #3 →  Back

BENEFICIATION PROCESSES
ArticleName Improvement of the fine coking coal flotation technolgy
DOI 10.17580/or.2021.03.02
ArticleAuthor Alexandrova T. N., Kuskov V. B., Afanasova A. V., Kuznetsov V. V.
ArticleAuthorData

Saint-Petersburg Mining University (St. Petersburg, Russia):

Aleksandrova Т. N., Head of Chair, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor, Aleksandrova_TN@pers.spmi.ru
Kuskov V. B., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, Kuskov_VB@pers.spmi.ru
Afanasova А. V., Teaching Assistant, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Afanasova_AV@pers.spmi.ru
Kuznetsov V. V., Postgraduate Student

Abstract

The paper presents data on the development of a reagent regime for the flotation of fine coal fractions of –0.5+0 mm. The study focuses on coking coal from the Butovskaya mine (Kemerovo coal deposit, Russia). The ash content in the rock mass mined ranges from 23 to 30 %. Using the methods of optical microscopy, the presence of rock-forming minerals in the flotation feed, mainly represented by silicates (quartz), was established, which supports the addition of liquid glass to the process as a depressant for silicates. The study of the flotation kinetics allowed establishing the coal flotation time for a more complete recovery of the combustible matter. The paper compares the basic and alternative reagent regimes. The basic regime is represented by an apolar collector in the form of a mixture of hydrocarbon liquids of petroleum origin and a frother containing oxygen-bearing chemical compounds of various molecular structures in its group chemical composition. The alternative regime includes a depressant (liquid glass), an apolar collector (diesel fuel), and a frother represented by a mixture of aliphatic alcohols, ethers, and esters. Using the technology developed, coal flotation concentrate was obtained with the mass fraction of ash of 7.36 % and recovery of 9.78 %, allowing to generate a product meeting the requirements of GOST R 51588-2000.
The work was carried out with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 19-17-00096).

keywords Coking coal, coal slimes, flotation, densimetric analysis, coal concentrate, ash content, combustible matter
References

1. Zhiznin S. Z., Cherechukin А. V. The Russian coal in world trade. Ekonomika: Vchera, Segodnya, Zavtra. 2018. Vol. 8, No. 2А. pp. 175–181.
2. Krasnyansky G. L., Revazov M. A. The current state of the coal industry and prospects for innovative development. Moscow: Gornaya Kniga, 2010. 34 p.
3. Hayitov O. G., Umirzoqov А. A., Iskandarov J., Suvanov F. Prospects for the industrial use of coal in the world and its process of reproducing. JournalNX – A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal. 2020. Vol. 6, Iss. 5. pp. 240–247.
4. Bazhin V. Yu. Changes in thermal plasticity of low grade coals during selective extraction of metals. Zapiski Gornogo Instituta. 2016. Vol. 220. pp. 578–581.
5. Xia Y., Zhang R., Cao Y., Xing Y., Gui X. Role of molecular simulation in understanding the mechanism of low-rank coal flotation: A review. Fuel. 2020. Vol. 262. DOI: 10.1016/j. fuel.2019.116535.
6. Ozkan S. G. Further investigations on simultaneous ultrasonic coal flotation. Minerals. 2017. Vol. 7, Iss. 10. 9 p. DOI: 10.3390/min7100177.
7. Litvinenko V. S., Pashkevich N. V., Shuvalov Yu. V. Ecological capacity of the natural environment of the Kemerovo region. Industrial development prospects. EKO-byulleten' InEkA. 2008. No. 3. pp. 28–34.
8. Pashkevich M. A., Petrova T. A., Sverchkov I. P. Moist waste coal properties and recycling prospects. Obogashchenie Rud. 2017. No. 1. pp. 46–50. DOI: 10.17580/or.2017.01.09.
9. Solov'eva E. A., Lebedeva O. Yu. Socio-economic and environmental problems of the coal industry development in Russia. Zapiski Gornogo Instituta. 2003. No. 1. pp. 256–259.
10. Patrakov Yu. F., Semenova S. A., Klein M. S. Flotation enrichment of coking coals using ozonated spent motor oils. Koks i Khimiya. 2017. No. 12. pp. 46–49.
11. Pashkevich М. А., Sverchkov I. P., Chukaeva M. A. Study of process properties of coal-water slurries produced from coalpreparation waste slurry. Obogashchenie Rud. 2017. No. 6. pp. 54–57. DOI: 10.17580/or.2017.06.10.
12. Dai S., Bechtel A., Eble C. F., Flores R. M., French D., Graham I. T., Hood M. M., Hower J. C., Korasidis V. A., Moore T. A., Püttmann W., Wei Q., Zhao L., O'Keefe J. M. K. Recognition of peat depositional environments in coal: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology. 2020. Vol. 219. DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103383.
13. Arsentyev V. A., Gerasimov A. M., Dmitriev S. V., Samukov А. D. A study of mineral coal physical-chemical properties changes in thermochemical modification process. Obogashchenie Rud. 2016. No. 3. pp. 3–8. DOI: 10.17580/or.2016.03.01.
14. Gerasimov A. M., Dmitriev S. V. A combined technology of dry beneficiation of coal. Obogashchenie Rud. 2016. No. 6. pp. 9–13. DOI: 10.17580/or.2016.06.02.
15. Lebedik O. Yu. Ways to improve the competitiveness of Russian coal companies. Zapiski Gornogo Instituta. 2004. No. 1. pp. 185–188.
16. Zhao Y., Li G., Luo Z., Zhang B., Dong L., Liang C., Duan C. Industrial application of a modularized dry-coal-beneficiation technique based on a novel air dense medium fluidized bed. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization. 2017. Vol. 37, Iss. 1. pp. 44–57.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back