National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow, Russia:

A. G. Vorobev, Head of a Chair “Economics”
D. V. Timokhin, Deputy Head of a Chair “Economics”, e-mail: dtprepod@yandex.ru
M. V. Bugaenko, Senior Lecturer, e-mail: m.v.bugaenko@mail.ru

The object of this article is to review the energy system of the Eurasian Union. The subject of consideration is the existing system of production, financial and other communication channels in the energy sector. The purpose of this article is adaptation of the methodology of “economic cross”, proposed by the authors, to the standards of the Federal Law “On the strategic planning in the Russian Federation” (172-FZ of June 28, 2014) and describing the results on the example of its use for the purpose of forming the united energetic sector of the Eurasian Union. The paper rises the questions, concerning the efficiency of a modern system of integration processes in the Eurasian space in the energy sector. The main impediments to its effectiveness and impeding innovation reorientation of energy production of the Eurasian Union are identified. The methodology of energetic organization structure simulation is proposed in this article. It describes communication channels between the Eurasian Union members’ energy enterprises, which currently operate mainly in the context of national energy systems for now. An important advantage of the proposed article methodological tool for predicting the strategic development of energy systems is that it provides the ability to detect the early stages of spillovers from the actions of participants in all stages of the “economic cross” and allows you to compare the different “economic crosses” models.

1. Eurasian Development Bank. Available at: www.eabr.org (in Russian).
2. Gromov A. O Evraziyskoy energeticheskoy doktrine (About the Eurasian power doctrine). Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn = International affairs. 2012. No. 7. pp. 94–101.
3. Shamtsyan M. Food legislation and its harmonization in Russia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. August 2014. Vol. 94, Iss. 10. pp. 1966–1969.
4. Informatsionnyy byulleten Torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federatsii (regionalnoe predstavitelstvo v tsentralnoy Azii). Tamozhennyy soyuz Belarus – Kazakh stan – Rossiya. Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz (Informational bulletin of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation (regional representation in Central Asia). Customs union Belarus – Kazakhstan – Russia. Eurasian economic Union). Regionalnoe predstavitelstvo Torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty v tsentralnoy Azii (Regional representation of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Central Asia). Almaty, May 2014. (in Russian).
5. Godlevskaya N.V. Postsovetskaya tsentralnaya Aziya: razvitie magistralnoy nefteprovodnoy i gazoprovodnoy infrastruktury (Post-Soviet Central Asia: development of main pipe-line and gas-line infrastructure). Electronic scientific journal “Oil and Gas Business”. 2006. No. 2. Available at: http://ogbus.ru/authors/Godlevskaya/Godlevskaya_1.pdf.

6. Lu H., Qian C. A study on economy and trade competition between China and Brazil. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing. 2012. Vol. 136. pp. 151–160.
7. Kulbatyrov N. N., Tulepbekova A. A. Energeticheskiy aspekt Evraziyskoy integratsii (Energetic aspect of Eurasian integration). Evraziyskaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya = Eurasian Economic integration. 2014. February, No. 1(22).
8. Litvinenko I. L., Akperov I. G. Metodologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya programm regionalnogo razvitiya s uchetom vliyaniya transnatsionalnykh korporatsiy (Methodological basis of the formation of regional development programs taking into account multinational corporations influence). Terra Economicus. 2009. Vol. 7, No. 3–3. pp. 212–214.
9. Obespechenie energoeffektivnosti. Razvitie energeticheskoy politiki, zadachi i vozmozhnosti (Energy efficiency provision. Development of energetic policy, tasks and possibilities). Moscow : Energy Charter Secretatriat, 2007. (in Russian).
10. Evraziyskiy integratsionnyy proekt: effekty i problemy realizatsii (nauchnyy doklad) (Eurasian integration project: effects and problems of realization (scientific report)). Under the general editorship of S. P. Glinkina. Moscow : Institute of Economics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013.
11. Techexpert. Information Channel on Technical Regulation in Russia. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902115664 (in Russian).
12. Litvinenko I. L. Formirovanie programm sotsialnoekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona v usloviyakh transnatsionalizatsii: avtoreferat dissertatsii …. kandidata ekonomicheskikh nauk (Formation of regional social-economic development programs in the conditions of transnationalization : thesis of inauguration of Dissertation … Candidate of Economic Sciences). Rostov-on-Don : Maykop State Technological Institute of the Republic of Adygea, 2009.
13. Sabathil G. Making the strategic partnership between Japan and Europe work. Asia-Pacific Review. 3 July 2015. Vol. 22, Iss. 2. pp. 77–81.
14. M. Ganelin, S. Vasin. Analiticheskiy obzor otkrytogo aktsionernogo obshchestva “Gazprombank” ot 09. 07. 2014 (Analytical review of the JSC “Gazprombank” on July 09, 2014). Moscow : Printing House of JSC “Gazprompank”, 2014.
15. Wang Shuchun, Wang Cinsun. Perspektivy Evraziyskogo integratsionnogo proekta i ego posledstviya dlya Kitaya (Prospects of Eurasian integration project and its consequences for China). Obozrevatel = Observer. 2013. No. 4.
16. Yu H., Yin N., Wu J., Xu Q., Yang X. Research and reform of CDIO engineering education mode. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Volume 111 LNEE. 2011. pp. 617–620.
17. Putilov A. V., Vorobev A. G., Timokhin D. V., Razorenov M. Yu. Ispolzovanie metoda “ekonomicheskogo kresta” v raschetakh potrebnosti yadernogo topliva dlya razvitiya atomnoy energetiki (Usage of “economic cross” method in calculations of nuclear fuel demands for the development of nuclear energetics). Tsvetnye Metally = Non-ferrous metals. 2013. No. 9. pp. 18–26.
18. Zharikov V. V., Zharikov R. V Teoriya tsiklichnosti razvitiya kak rezultat vnedreniya innovatsiy (Theory of cyclic character of development as a result of innovations). Perspektivy nauki = Science prospects. 2012. No. 6(33). pp. 167–169.
19. Dluhosch B. Tit-for-tat in trade policies: Nothing but a fest for vested interests? Journal of Institutional Economics. 1 March 2016. Vol. 12, Iss. 1. pp. 217–239.
20. Kiratli O. S. Political discourses on Europe and European integration in national election manifestos and party programmes. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 15 July 2015. 24 p.
21. Yu. Glazev. O tselyakh, problemakh i merakh gosudarstvennoy politiki i integratsii (About the purposes, problems and measures of the state policy and integration). Evraziyskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika = Eurasian integration: economics, law, policy. 2013. No. 13.
22. Khasanova G. F., Burenina I. V. Sinergiya kak metod povysheniya effektivnosti deyatelnosti kompanii (Synergy as a method of increasing of company operation efficiency). Neftegazovoe delo = Oil and Gas Business. 2011. No. 6.
23. Putilov A. V., Vorobev A. G., Timokhin D. V., Razorenov M. Yu., Myakota E. A. Metody sovershenstvovaniya prognozirovaniya razvitiya energosnabzheniya mestorozhdeniy poleznykh iskopaemykh (Methods of improvement of forecasting of development of mineral deposits’ power supply). Tsvetnye Metally = Non-ferrous metals. 2014. No. 2. pp. 11–18.