Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia:

K. N. Trubetskoy, Counselor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, trubetsk@ipkon.ran.ru

VIST Group, Moscow, Russia:
D. Ya. Vladimirov, Chief Executive Officer

Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia
I. A. Pytalev, Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
T. M. Popova, Candidate for a Master’s Degree

This brief analytical review focuses on development and improvement in mining machinery. The tendencies toward introduction of industrial robots into various spheres of human activity are defined. The scope of the description embraces features of application of robotic mining and transport machines in hard mineral mining in complicated geological, geotechnical and climatic conditions. The outlook is given for the full-scale adaptation of robotic systems to open pit mining. The further improvement in the area of open pit mine transport should be based upon the positive experience of industrial tests of robot-aided dump trucks. The robotics terms are interpreted in the context of mining with a view to eliminate differences and ambiguity in defi nitions, considering modern achievements in science and technology. The notion of robotic mining system is substantiated, and a flow chart is proposed for interaction between the control and mining systems in the framework of the robotic system operation in a mine. The key design elements of such system include mine structures, control and guidance facilities for robotic transportation equipment, the equipment sensors, automated control and global positioning system. It is proved that the basic advantages of the robotic machinery in open pit mining are considerable reduction in overburden volume to be removed and, as a consequence, decrease in land area to be taken to accommodate open pit mine infrastructure, as well as increase in equipment and mine capacity and the concurrent enhancement of mine safety, including environmental security. The article denotes areas of economical and environmental effectivization of mines as well as mine safety improvement achievable with the introduction of robotic transportation equipment.
This study has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 14-37-00050.

1. Trubetskoy K. N. Perspektivy primeneniya robotizirovannoy tekhniki na karerakh budushchego (Prospects of application of robotized technics on future open pits). Trudy nauchnogo simpoziuma «Nedelya gornyaka-2013» (Proceedings of scientific symposium «Miner's week-2013»). Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten = Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2013. Special issue No. 1. pp. 354–363.
2. Trubetskoy K. N. Tekhnologii upravleniya gornymi rabotami v karerakh: perspektivy razvitiya (Open pit mining control technologies: state-of-the art and future considerations). Gornyi Zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2013. No. 7. pp. 4–6.
3. Rylnikov A. G. Stabilizatsiya kachestva rudnoy massy na karerakh s primeneniem metoda dinamicheskogo programmirovaniya (Stabilization of ore mass quality on open pits with application of dynamic programming method). Marksheyderskiy vestnik = Mine Surveying Bulletin. 2013. No. 6. pp. 11–15.
4. Brown C. Autonomous Vehicle Technology in Mining. Autonomous Mining. 2012. No. 1. pp. 30–32.
5. Arvidsson S. Remote control and automation in Swedish iron ore mining Géosciences. 2005. No. 1. pp. 64–70.
6. Nebot E. Surface mining: main research issues for autonomous operations. Robotics Research. 2007. Vol. 28. pp. 268–280.
7. Rukovodstvo po proektirovaniyu bortov karera (Guidelines for Open pit slope design). Read J., Stacey P. (ed.). Translated from English. Ekaterinburg : Pravoved, 2015. 544 p.
8. Thompson R., Hahn S., Pastor S. Development of mine haul road surfacing condition monitoring through digital image processing. Mining Engineering. 2015. Vol. 67, No. 9. pp. 34–45.
9. Van Berkel R. Eco-efficiency in the Australian minerals processing sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007. No. 15. pp. 741–755.
10. Smirnova Yu. Roboty vmesto lyudey (Robots instead of people). Forbes. 2011. Available at: http://www.forbes.ru/tehno-slideshow/tehnologii/71560-roboty-vmesto-lyudei/slide/1 (accessed: April 26, 2016).
11. GOST R ISO 8373-2014. Roboty i robototekhnicheskie ustroystva. Terminy i opredeleniya (State Standard R ISO 8373-2014. Robots and robotic devices. Vocabulary). Moscow : Standardinform, 2015. 37 p. (in Russian).
12. GOST 25685-83. Roboty promyshlennye. Klassifikatsiya (State Standard 25685-83. Industrial robots. Classification). Moscow : Publishing House of Standards, 1983. 6 p. (in Russian).
13. GOST 28732-90. Roboty promyshlennye. Trebovaniya k organizatsii vneshnikh svyazey s ustroystvami programmnogo upravleniya (State Standard 28732-90. Industrial robots. Requirements to organizing of external connection with programme control devices). Moscow : Publishing House of Standards, 1991. 15 p. (in Russian).
14. GOST 27696-88. Roboty promyshlennye. Interfeysy. Tekhnicheskie trebovaniya (State Standard 27696-88. Industrial robots. Interfaces. Technical requirements). Moscow : Publishing House of Standards, 1998. 8 p. (in Russian).
15. Green J. J., Hlophe K., Dickens J., Teleka R., Price M. Mining robotic sensors. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 2012. Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 8–15.
16. Trubetskoy K. N., Krasnyanskiy G. L., Khronin V. V., Kovalenko V. S. Proektirovanie karerov : uchebnik (Open pit designing: tutorial). Third edition, revised. Moscow : Vysshaya shkola, 2009. 694 p.