Uralgiproruda Institute, Ekaterinburg, Russia:

B. A. Buinov, Chief Designer of Construction Sector, mail@urguda.ru

The article presents a case study of engineering decision-making by the Uralgiproruda Institute (hereinafter, the Institute) in the tower-type derrick design for Cheremukhovskaya-Glubokaya mine of Sevuralboksitruda. The construction was executed by SUBRstroi Construction Management of the North Ural Bauxite Mine. The tower derrick was equipped with two multi-cable skip machines at elevation +66.3 m and one multi-cable cage machine at elevation +74.9 m. An overhead crane with capacity of 60 t was installed at elevation of 83 m. Two intake bunkers each with capacity of 145 m³ were placed at elevation of 26.1 m. Tower derrick had outside dimension 21.9×21.9 m and the height of 90 m. The wall thickness was 300 m above elevation of 0 m. The walls were made of cast in-situ reinforced concrete. The foundation piling of the structure had 4 piles with a diameter of 3.2 m and 20–26 m long, placed at outward corners of the tower derrick. The construction process involved the method of layer-by-layer concreting. The tower derrick construction design used ArchiCAD and AutoCADMEP software with 3D modeling of the derrick.

1. Migilinskas D., Popov V., Juocevicius V., Ustinovichius L. The benefi ts, obstacles and problems of practical BIM implementation. Procedia Engineering. 2013. Vol. 57. pp. 767–774.
2. Porter S., Tan T., West G. Breaking into BIM: Performing static and dynamic security analysis with the aid of BIM. Automation in Construction. 2014. Vol. 40. pp. 84–95.
3. Cambeiro F. P., Barbeito F. P., Castaño I. G., Bolíbar M. F., Rodríguez J. R. Integration of agents in the construction of a single-family house through use of BIM technology. Procedia Engineering. 2014. Vol. 69. pp. 584–593.
4. Ptukhin I. A., Morozova T. F., Rakova K. M. Formirovanie otvetstvennosti uchastnikov stroitelstva za narushenie kalendarnykh srokov vypolneniya rabot po metodu PERT (Allocation of responsibility of construction participants for violation of calendar terms of work performance according to the PERT method). Stroitelstvo unikalnykh zdaniy i sooruzheniy = Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2014. No. 3(18). pp. 57–71.
5. Kulikov A., Kirillova M. Opyt trekhmernogo proektirovaniya v Institute territorialnogo razvitiya (Experience of 3d-design in the Institute of Territorial Development). SAPR i grafika = CAD and graphics. 2012. No. 2. pp. 26–30.
6. Gorodetskiy A. S., Evzerov I. D. Kompyuternye modeli konstruktsiy (Computer models of designs). Moscow : Publising House ASV, 2009. 358 p.
7. Ding L., Zhou Y., Akinci B. Building information modeling (BIM) application framework: the process of expanding from 3D to computable. Automationin Construction. 2014. No. 46. pp. 82–93.
8. Talapov V. Tekhnologiya BIM: na smenu chercheniyu prikhodyat modelirovanie i vychisleniya (BIM technology: drawing is replaced by modeling and calculations). AutodeskCommunity. 2012. No. 1(3). pp. 10–11.
9. Chesnokov S., Shmakov A., Shchipachov A. AutoCADMEP nashel primenenie v atomnoy promyshlennosti (AutoCADMEP found its application in nuclear industry). SAPR i grafika = CAD and graphics. 2014. No. 6. pp. 26–28.
10. Ioskevich A. V., Savchenko A. V. Sravnenie programmno-vychislitelnykh kompleksov SCAD Office i Lira-SAPR na primere rascheta bashni svyazi (Comparison of SCAD Office and LIRA-SAPR on the example of calculation of communications tower). Stroitelstvo unikalnykh zdaniy i sooruzheniy = Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2014. No. 10(25). pp. 7–21.
11. Andreev V. E. Proektirovanie. Stroitelstvo i ekspluatatsiya bashennykh koprov (Design. Construction and exploitation of tower headframes). Moscow : Nedra, 1940. 240 p.
12. Gabidulin V. N. Adaptatsiya AutoCAD pod standarty predpriyatiya (Adaptation of AutoCAD for the enterprise standards). Moscow : DMK Press, 2014. 210 p.