Journals →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2017 →  #3 →  Back

BENEFICIATION PROCESSES
ArticleName Calcium minerals properties contrast increase in scheelite-carbonate ores flotation
DOI 10.17580/or.2017.03.07
ArticleAuthor Shepeta E. D., Ignatkina V. A., Samatova L. A.
ArticleAuthorData

Institute of Mining FEB RAS (Khabarovsk, Russia):
Shepeta E. D., Senior Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, elenashepeta56@mail.ru
Samatova L. A., Head of Laboratory, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, samatova_luiza@mail.ru

National University of Science and Technology «MISIS» (Moscow, Russia):

Ignatkina V. A., Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, woda@mail.ru

Abstract

The results of the studies on possible increase in flotation properties contrast of scheelite and calcite mono-mineral fractions using combinations of oxyhydrillic collectors: ionogenic collector (sodium oleate) and a low-polar compound (isododecyl alcohol) are presented. The difference in sorption character of iso-alcohols and sodium oleate in presence of the former on calcite and scheelite surface is shown. The effect of calcite (limestone and marble) on scheelite floatability was appraised. Ranges of carbonate module and conditions for sheelitecalcite complex separation were determined. The results of scheelite flotation from the Vostok-2 deposit scheelite-carbonate ore with WO3 mass fraction of 0.67 % and СаСО3 mass fraction of 18.0 % were defined more exactly. At the Primorskaya Plant, with sodium silicate (water glass) consumption of 350 g/t and that of sodium oleate being 150–300 g/t, minimum scheelite loss was achieved. Scheelite rougher concentrate yield with WO3 mass fraction of 6.6–4.8 % and СаСО3 mass fraction of 31–29 % was 7–11 %, recovery of scheelite and calcite being 91.6-94.2 % and 17–22 %, respectively. Scheelite recovery into saleable concentrate was 83.3–85.7 %. At the Primorskaya Plant, water glass consumption increase to 1.0 kg/t (collector consumption being 300 g/t) leads to steady production of saleable concentrate and rougher concentrate yield decrease to 4 %, but also to scheelite recovery decrease to 76 %. With water glass consumption of 1.9 kg/t (collector consumption being 150 g/t), minerals flotation is stopped.
The studies on mono-mineral fractions were performed with the aid of the Russian Foundation of Fundamental Research (the Grant 17-05-00241).

keywords Scheelite-carbonate ore, carbonate module, flotation, sodium silicate, sodium oleate, combination of ionogenic and nonionogenic collectors
References

1. Kononov O. V., Koshchug D. G., Nesterov I. V. Heterogeneity of minerals and the nature of limited isomorphism of the scheelite-povellite series. Heterogeneity of minerals and crystal growth. Moscow: Nedra, 1980. pp. 128–134.
2. Barskiy L. A., Kononov O. V., Ratmirova L. I. Selective flotation of calcium-containing minerals. Moscow: Nedra, 1979. 232 p.
3. Arsentyev V. A., Gorlovskiy S. I., Ustinov I. D. Complex action of flotation reagents. Moscow: Nedra, 1992. 160 p.
4. Petrov I. S. A new method for flotation of poor scheelite ores. Works of the Mekhanobr Institute. ONTI, 1940.
5. Yu Y., Sun C., Song Z., Zhang X. The mechanism on separation of scheelite and calcium minerals in heating process. Proc. of the XXVII IMPC. Satiago, 2014. Chap. 7. pp. 133–143.
6. Ustinov I. D., Ryaboy V. I., Koroleva E. V., Petrova L. N. Improving the technology of flotation of molybdenumscheelite ores with the use of new collectors. Processing of oxidized ores. Moscow: Nauka, 1995. pp. 22–25.
7. Ryaboy V. I. Development of works on flotation reagents at the «Mekhanobr» Institute. Obogashchenie Rud. 1995. No. 1–2. pp. 116–121.
8. Yuesheng Gao, Zhiyong Gao, Wei Sun, Yuehua Hu. Selective flotation of scheelite from calcite: A novel reagent scheme. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2016. Vol. 154. pp. 10–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro. 2016.06.010.
9. Zhiyong Gao, Ding Bai, Wei Sun, Xuefeng Cao, Yuehua Hu. Selective flotation of scheelite from calcite and fluorite using a collector mixture. Minerals Engineering. 2015. Vol. 72. pp. 23–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.12.025.
10. Abramov A. A., Hoberg H. Mechanism and regularities of the minerals genetic features influence on their adsorption and flotation properties. Tsvetnye Metally. 2008. No. 2. pp. 26– 34.
11. Samatova L. A., Shepeta E. D., Gvozdev V. I. Poor scheelite ores from Primorye deposits: Mineralogy and processing characteristics and dressing flowsheets. Fizikotekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopayemykh. 2012. No. 3. pp. 152–161.
12. Sorokin M. M., Shepeta E. D., Kuvaeva I. V. Development of optimal conditions for refinement of scheelite concentrates with increased content of apatite. Izvestiya Vuzov. Tsvetnaya Metallurgiya. 1986. No. 6. pp. 8–11.
13. Ignatkina V. A., Filippov L. O., Shokhin V. N. Investigation of the effect of non-ionic compounds on the adsorption of sodium oleate with calcium-containing minerals. Tsvetnaya Metallurgiya. 1993. No. 9. pp. 19–22.
14. Kurkov A. V. Reagents of secondary action — a tool for increasing the efficiency of non-sulfide ores flotation. II Congress of CIS countries mineral processors. Abstracts. Moscow: MISiS, 1999. p. 63.
15. Filippov L. O., Shokhin V. N., Enbaeva L. I., Ignatkina V. A. Increase of technological parameters of flotation using a combination of sodium oleate and exol B reagents. Tsvetnye Metally. 1993. No. 1. pp. 60–64.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back