ArticleName |
Role of labor relations in competitive recovery of coal mines |
ArticleAuthorData |
Institute of Mining Industry Efficiency and Safety, Chelyabinsk, Russia:
N. V. Galkina, Leading Researcher, Doctor of Economic Sciences S. I. Zakharov, Head of a Laboratory, Candidate of Economic Sciences, svzakharov@bk.ru
SUEK-Khakassia, Chernogorsk, Russia:
V. A. Azev, Deputy Chief Executive Officer–Technical Officer, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
Izykhsky Open Pit Mine, Bely Yar, Russia:
A. V. Osharov, Chief Executive Officer |
Abstract |
The relevance of the research subject is conditioned by the increased rate and low predictability of fluctuations in the markets of energy resources, capital stocks and man power, and by the required sustainable performance of coal mines under such circumstances. The aim of the study is to prioritize labor relations which, combined with advanced technology and equipment, will enable persistent competitive ability of a mine in the conditions of high dynamics and uncertainty of the market environment. The article reveals close connection between labor relations and organization structure of a mining company. The proposed approach to optimizing organization structure is based on the balance between the interests and responsibilities of the subjects of labor relations, which includes full use of human capital assets and reduction in loss of time and resources. The suggested competitive recovery measures are based on the analysis of trends in labor relations, comparison of levels and dynamics of labor productivity in Russian and foreign mines, as well as on appraisal and generalization of performance of coal mines. The implementation of the proposed development of labor relations is illustrated in terms of an open pit coal mine first suffering recession and then improving its competitive positions later on. |
References |
1. Meyer C., Davis S. It's Alive: The Coming Convergence of Information, Biology, and Business. Crown Business, 2003. 288 p. 2. Anthony S. D., Viguerie S. P., Waldeck A. Corporate Longevity: Turbulence Ahead for Large Organizations. Innosight Strategy & Innovation, 2016. 9 p. Available at: https://www.innosight.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Corporate-Longevity-2016-Final.pdf (accessed: 12.04.2017). 3. Level of GDP per capita and productivity. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2016. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PDB_LV (accessed: 20.05.2017). 4. Labor productivity. The Economist, 2013. Available at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2013/02/focus-3 (accessed: 20.05.2017). 5. Investors: Key Financial Information. Anglo American. Available at: http://www.angloamerican.com/investors/financial-results-centre/key-financial-information (accessed: 30.10.2017). 6. Production Report for the 12 months ended 31 December 2012. Xstrata, 2013. 3 p. Available at: http://www.glencore.com/assets/investors/doc/reports_and_results/xstrata/2012/xta-ims-pr-2012q4.pdf (accessed: 30.10.2017). 7. Mackenzie A. Financial results Year ended 30 June 2016. BHP Billiton, 2016. 34 p. Available at: http://www.bhp.com/-/media/bhp/documents/investors/news/2016/160816_bhpbillitonresultspresentationyearended30june2016.pdf?la=en (accessed: 30.10.2017). 8. Tarazanov I. G. Russia’s coal industry performance for January – December, 2016. Ugol. 2017. No. 3. pp. 36–50.
9. Belkin V. N., Belkina N. A. How to manage the labor. Ekaterinburg : Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2005. 304 p. 10. Galkina N. V. Social-economic adaptation of coal enterprise to innovation model of technological development. Moscow : Ekonomika, 2007. 248 p. 11. Osharov A. V., Zakharov S. I. Duty time structure of executives of a coal open pit mine. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2014. Special issue No. 5. Organization and control of mining enterprise. pp. 159–168. 12. Korkina T. A. Formation and use of human resources of enterprise as a factor of innovation development. Rational competitiveness and education in the context of global challenges : collection of articles of International scientific and practical conference of the IV opening day of science and business in the Urals. Chelyabinsk : Entsiklopediya, 2017. pp. 195–199. 13. Galkin V. A., Makarov A. M., Kravchuk I. L., Lapaeva O. A. The human factor role in mining plant viability. Problemy nedropolzovaniya. 2016. No. 4. pp. 189–197. Available at: https://trud.igduran.ru/edition/11/22 (accessed: 15.09.2017). 14. Korkina T. A. Development of innovation sensibility of coal mining enterprises personnel. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2009. No. 6. pp. 67–75. 15. Kaplan A. V. Control of social-economic development of mining enterprise. Moscow : Ekonomika, 2015. 270 p. 16. Ahmady G. A., Mehrpour M., Nikooravesh A. Organizational Structure. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016. Vol. 230. pp. 455–462. 17. Kanten P., Kanten S., Gurlek M. The Effects of Organizational Structures and Learning Organization on Job Embeddedness and Individual Adaptive Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. Vol. 23. pp. 1358–1366. 18. Kilin Yu. A., Osharov A. V., Shivyryalkina O. S. About the Functions and Tools of Director. Ugol. 2015. No. 2. pp. 34–35. 19. Kilin A. B. Formation of innovation organization structure of coal mining production association. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2010. 28 p. |