Название |
Comparison tests of densometers for mineral processing plants |
Информация об авторе |
Poltava Mining and Processing Plant, Gorishni Plavni, Ukraine:
Yu. A. Arseniev, Director of Information Technologies, Automation and Communication I. K. Amelchenya, Chief Engineer of Crushing-and-Preparation Plant O. P. Dyadyura, Chief Metrology Expert, momot@ukr.net T. N. Chekunov, Head of Automated Process Control Unit |
Реферат |
The majority of the process circuits at mining-and-processing plants operate with pulp, and, accordingly, the first priority of automated processing control is to measure continuously pulp density. At the Poltava Mining and Processing Plant, the tests of two most promising series-produced densometers were carried out, namely, Gamma Densometer manufactured by Berthold, Germany, and Canadian-made strain gaugetype volume–weight flow density meter DENCELL. The sampling material was the discharge of a KSNtype spiral classifier 12.5×3 m and the discharge of a flotation circuit cyclone at the preparation plant. The many years of experience gained in operation of this equipment allow objective analysis of virtues and shortcomings of two densometers. The testing results can be useful in optimizing the choice of industrial density meters in order to control and adjust process flowsheets depending on the specific tasks and standards of processing plants. |
Библиографический список |
1. Morozov V. V., Topchaev V. P., Ulitenko K. Ya., Ganbaator Z., Delgerbat L. Development and use of automated systems of control of mineral beneficiation processes. Moscow : “Ore and Metals” Publishing House, 2013. 512 p. 2. Zimin A. V., Trushin A. A., Bondarenko A. V. Vector of development of means and systems of automation for mining-concentration productions at Scientifi c and Production Association "RIVS". Gornyi Zhurnal. 2014. No. 11. pp. 91–95.
3. Tangsathitkulchai C. Effects of slurry concentration and powder filling on the net mill power of a laboratory ball mill. Powder Technology. 2003. Vol. 137. pp. 131–138. 4. Azaryan A. A., Krivenko Yu. Yu., Kucher V. G. Automation of the first stage of growing, classification and magnetic separation shallow is the real way of increase of efficiency of enriching of iron-stones. Vіsnik Krivorіzkogo natsіonalnogo unіversitetu. 2014. No. 36. pp. 275–280. 5. Kachura E. V., Alkhuri F. S. R. Automation of the opening of iron ore in the second and third stages of grinding. Vіsnik Krivorіzkogo natsіonalnogo unіversitetu. 2013. No. 34. pp. 76–80. 6. Goncharov Yu. G., Davidkovich A. S., Geyzenblazen B. E., Gulenko G. V. Automatic control and regulation of technological processes at iron ore concentration plants. Moscow : Nedra, 1968. 227 p. 7. Kivilis S. S. Densimeters. Moscow : Energiya, 1980. 279 p. 8. Webster J. G., Eren H. Measurement, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook: Spatial, Mechanical, Thermal, and Radiation Measurement. 2nd ed. New York : CRC Press, 2014. 1640 p. 9. Viana S. A. A. Do Nuclear Instruments Always Need to Be Used? Engineering and Mining Journal. 2017. Vol. 218, Iss. 2. pp. 46–51. 10. Kovalyukh M. V., Kovalyukh S. V. New generation coal-pulverizing pipe-conical mill, tools and control units. Energetika i elektrifikatsiya. 2001. No. 8. pp. 45–54. 11. Kovalyukh S. V. Strain gauge for volume-weight liquid density meter and volume-weight liquid density meter on its basis. Patent RF, No. 2015145975. Applied: 29.04.2014. Published: 09.06.2017. Bulletin No.16. 12. Products. Berthold Technologies, 2018. Available at: https://www.berthold.com/en/pc/products (accessed: 19.02.2018). 13. Batey R. H. Non-Nuclear Density Meter and Mass Flow System for Dredging Slurries. Proceedings of the 32nd Western Dredging Association Technical Conference. New York : Curran Associates, 2012. pp. 1–14. 14. Hashemi S. A., Sadighian A., Shah S. I. A., Sanders R. S. Solid velocity and concentration fluctuations in highly concentrated liquid–solid (slurry) pipe flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2014. Vol. 66. pp. 46–61. 15. Kovalyukh S. V., Kovalyukh V. R. A New Generation Grinding Unit. World Cement. 2009. No. 10. pp. 1–8. |