Sokolov–Sarbai Mining and Processing Integrated Works (JSC SSGPO), Rudny, Kazakhstan:

S. V. Kuzmenko, Vice-President of Production

Kunaev Mining Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan:
L. S. Shamganova, Deputy Director of Science, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
A. A. Baltieva, Doctoral Candidate, Head of Laboratory, igd.ogm@gmail.com

Institute of Space Technique and Technology, Almaty, Kazakhstan:

D. Sh. Akhmedov, Director, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

For any open pit mining company, operational planning, management and safety of operations are the key processes that govern the company’s overall performance. The open pit mining control system should use the data acquisition, communication, processing and storage equipment, which is treated as automation or informatization of management, i.e. creation of automated control systems. Reliable and highly precise positioning of machinery and personnel in an open pit mine, as well as equipment of surveying and geomechanics services with the coordinate and time inspection instrumentation will ensure the integrated control and monitoring of the condition and location of objects inside and outside an open pit mine. Based on the high-precision positioning, an automated system of control over open pit mining processes is formed, including a module of joint geomonitoring of pit walls and dumps. The full-scale introduction of the system will promote essential improvement in safety and economic efficiency of mining. This article considers the first stage of transition to this system – creation of information and navigation equipment for open pit mines of Sokolov–Sarbai Mining and Processing Integrated Works (JSC SSGPO). The high-precision satellite positioning technology described in the article exhibits sustainable prospects for further development, while its end product (background differential correction station) provides for the application of domestic R&D achievements, which will promote expansion of the proprietary network of reference stations. At the moment, the engineering of a unifi ed differential correction station for the full-scale operation at JSC SSGPO deposit is supported by the Committee of Science of the Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science in the form of grant financing of technical projects in 2018–2020 and partly by a private business partner of JSC SSGPO.

1. Hofmann-Wellenhof B., Lichtenegger H., Wasle E. GNSS – Global Navigation Satellite Systems. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo & more. Wien : Springer, 2008. 548 p.
2. Dasgupta A. Evolution of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Geospatial World, 2016. Available at: https://www.geospatialworld.net/article/global-navigation-satellite-system-gnss/ (accessed: 19.04.2018).
3. Antonovich K. M. Navigation satellite system in geodesy. In two volumes, Moscow : Kartgeotsentr, 2005, Vol. 1, 334 p.
4. Andreev V. K., Novikov E. V., Samratov U. D., Tazhedinov D. B., Khvostov V. V., Filatov V. N. Pressing problems of technical regulation in the national geodetic and cartographic service in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Geospatial Technologies and Application Fields: Proceedings of the 10^th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow : Prospekt, 2014. pp.8–12.
5. Satellite station marking regulations. Moscow : TsNIIGAiK, 2001. 30 p.
6. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P020001403_ (accessed: 19.04.2018).
7. Chernova I. Yu. Coordinate system of 1942 (SK–42): tutorial and teacher edition. Kazan, 2002. 25 p.
8. Huaan Fan, Chymyrov A. Coordinate transformation between SK-63 and ITRF in Kyrgyzstan. Geospatial Management of Land, Water and Resources : Proceedings of the Central Asia GIS Conference – GISCA 2015. Tashkent, 2015. pp. 74–80.
9. GKINP (GNTA)-01-020−09. Basic provisions of the national geodetic and height networks in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Astana, 2009.
10. Akhmedov D. Sh., Shabelnikov E. A., Konysbaev E. K., Ibraev A. S. Local diff erential correction system. Vestnik avtomatizatsii. 2014. No. 4(46). pp. 51–55.
11. Baltiyeva A. A., Shamganova L. S. Analysis of mathematical models for solving problems of highaccuracy satellite geodesy. Proceedings of the 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017. Albena, 2017. Vol. 17, Iss. 22. pp. 91–98.
12. Shoganbekova D. A. Gravimetric model of geoid on the territory of the Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. Engineering Sciences – From Theory to Practice: Proceedings of LII International Scientific and Practical Conference. Novosibirsk : SibAK. 2015. No. 11(47). pp. 129–136.
13. Shoganbekova D., Huaan Fan, Pentayev T. Gravimetric Geoid Model Over Kazakhstan. Proceedings of the 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM 2015). Albena, 2015. Book 2, Vol. 2. pp. 283–290.
14. Richtlinie für den einheitlichen integrierten geodätischen Raumbezug des amtlichen Vermessungswesens in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Rili-RB-AdV). Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Vermessungsverwaltungen der Lander der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (AdV), 2017. 49 s.
15. Akhmedov D. Sh., Shabelnikov E. A., Information and navigation support in surveying based on the navigational satellite technologies. Science and Technolgy – Step towards the Future: Head-Notes of Papers of V World Engineering and Technology Congress – WCET-2012. Almaty, 2012. pp. 262–263.
16. Akhmedov D. Sh., Shabelnikov E. A., Averianov A. A., Boguspaev N. B. Testing accuracy of user positioning by differential station. Vestnik avtomatizatsii. 2013. No. 1(39). pp. 44–45.
17. Siedina S. A., Baltieva A. A., Shanganova L. S. Innovative methods of pit wall deformation monitoring. Bulletin of the Kazakh Head Architectural and Construction Academy. 2017. No. 3(65). pp. 224–230.
18. Kozhaev Zh. T., Mukhamedgalieva M. A., Mustafin M. G., Imansakipova B. B. Geoinformation system for geomechanical monitoring of ore deposits using spaceborn radar interferometry methods. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 2. pp. 39–44. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.02.07