ArticleName |
Degassing of the Earth: Scale and implications |
ArticleAuthorData |
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan:
S. Guliev, Vice-President, Professor, Doctor of Geologo-Mineralogical Sciences
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State Geological Prospecting University, Moscow, Russia: R. N. Mustaev, Head of Basic and Applied Research Department, Candidate of Geologo-Mineralogical Sciences, mustaevrn@mgri-rggru.ru V. Yu. Kerimov, Pro-Rector for Science, Professor, Doctor of Geologo-Mineralogical Sciences M. N. Yudin, Professor, Doctor of Physico-Mathematical Sciences |
Abstract |
The principles of degassing of the Earth are considered in the article. A direct assessment of the scale of hydrocarbon degassing of the Earth is a complex task and is possible only on the basis of multilevel monitoring using the latest analytical technologies based on aerospace and ground measuring devices in real time. Estimates of the gas regime were carried out on the basis of a geophysical observatory on the mud volcano Dashgil, Perekiskyul and others in real time during the period from 2003 to 2018. The gas monitoring station, located within the small salsa of the Dashgil volcano during the first phase of the study, included sensors for measuring the flow of methane, radon, atmospheric pressure and temperature. The carried out researches in the given area have allowed to establish that the processes of periodic separation of hydrocarbons from sedimentary rocks are characterized by considerable volumes and intensity. In the depths of some young basins, in particular, in the South Caspian basin, there is a naturally functioning continuous “technological line” for the transformation of underground matter into energy and chemical raw materials, characterized by high productivity and a valuable asset of the sedimentary complex of the basin. Focusing on a long-term perspective, on the basis of such a line, it is possible to create such a natural extracting and restoring oil and gas system that would be able to provide some guaranteed replenishment rate for a sufficiently long time. The most typical examples of excitation of a porous medium saturated with hydrocarbons are eruptions of mud volcanoes, the correlation of which, for example, with solar activity, gravitational fields (tidal and indecent variations) and thermobaric factors (rarefaction and negative pressure waves) show that low-amplitude physical effects can intensify processes in foci of excitation. |
References |
1. Buddenberg T., Bergins Ch., Harp G. Methanol and its fabrication methods in the iron and steel plants. Chernye Metally. 2018. No. 2. pp. 59–66. 2. Matusch D., Barz L., Becker L. Measurement of chromium (VI) concentration in exhausted gases in chromium coating unit. Chernye Metally. 2018. No. 5. pp. 41–46. 3. Beloglazov I. I., Bazhin V. Yu. Simulation of aerodynamic flows of gas withdrawal from coke batteries. CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2017. Vol. 13. pp. 10–13. DOI: 10.17580/cisisr.2017.01.02 4. Guliyev I. S., Huseynov D. A. Relics of mud volcanoes in the sedimentary cover of the South Caspian basin. Lithology and Mineral Resources. 2015. Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 311–321. 5. Kerimov V. Yu., Mustaev R. N., Yandarbiev N. Sh., Movsumzade E. M. Environment for the Formation of Shale Oil and Gas Accumulations in Low-Permeability Sequences of the Maikop Series, Fore-Caucasus. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2017. Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 879–892. 6. Huseynov D. A. Maturity of the hydrocarbon fluids and their deep stratigraphic souces in the South-Caspian Basin. Earth Science for Energy and Environment : Proceedings of the 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Madrid, 2015. 7. Kerimov V. Yu., Mustaev R. N., Dmitrievsky S. S., Zaitsev V. A. Evaluation of secondary filtration parameters of low-permeability shale strata of the Maikop series of Central and Eastern Ciscaucasia by the results of geomechanics modeling. Oil Industry. 2016. No. 9. pp. 18–21. 8. Tran A., Rudolph M. L., Manga M. Bubble mobility in mud and magmatic volcanoes. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2015. Vol. 294. pp. 11–24. 9. Judd A. G., Hovland M., Dimitrov L. I., Gil S. G., Jukes V. The geological methane budget at Continental Margins and its influence on climate changes. Geofluids. 2002. Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 109–126. 10. Kerimov V. Yu., Osipov A. V., Lavrenova E. A. The hydrocarbon potential of deep horizons in the southeastern part of the Volga-Urals oil and gas province. Oil Industry. 2014. No. 4. pp. 33–35. 11. Martynova G. S., Aliev A. A., Babaev F. R., Guliev I. S. Nanocolloid structures in crude oils from the mud volcanoes of Azerbaijan. Geochemistry International. 2013. Vol. 51, Iss. 9. pp. 764–766. 12. Aliev A. A. Consistent patterns of spatial-temporary of the mud volcanoes distribution in the Djeirankechmez-South Caspian depression. Geology and Mineral Resources of World Ocean. 2016. No. 4(46). pp. 67–80. 13. Kenshilikova M. T. Mud volcanoes as an oil occurrence sign. Geology, Geoecology and Resource Potential of the Ural and Adjacent Territories: III All-Russian Youth Geological Conference. Saint-Petersburg : Svoe izdatelstvo, 2015. pp. 10–12. 14. Aliev A. A. Mud volcanoes of the Caspian Sea. Geology and Mineral Resources of World Ocean. 2014. No. 1(35). pp. 33–44. 15. Baloglanov E. E., Abbasov O. R., Akhundov R. V., Huseynov A. R., Abbasov K. A., Nuruyev I. M. Daily activity of mud volcanoes and geoecological risk: a case from Gaynarja mud volcano, Azerbaijan. European Journal of Natural History. 2017. No. 4. pp. 22–27. |