Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State Geological Prospecting University, Moscow, Russia:

O. V. Skopintseva, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, skopintseva54@mail.ru
S. D. Ganova, Head of Chair, Professor, Doctor of Geologo-Mineralogical Sciences
N. V. Demin, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia:
V. I. Papichev, Leading Researcher, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

Numerous disastrous explosions of methane and coal dust in coal mines in Russia in recent years were accompanied by exogenous fires and had complex nature, i.e. involved a number of hazardous factors, namely, gas, dust, coal and gas outbursts and fires, while the explosion prevention system focuses on methane. Eventually, prevention of hazardous events should be integrated and coordinated. The foundation for the gas and dust hazard combating in mines is the coal and rock mass control by means of hydrodynamic treatment. On the other hand, efficiency of this approach is insufficiently high due to nonuniform distribution of injected fluid in coal seams and owing to low wettability of coal. In order to make coal wetting more uniform and effective, it is proposed to inject gas-filled solutions of surface active substances. This method includes drilling and sealing of holes, dissolving of gas, e.g. nitrogen, in water at a concentration from 0.3 to 1 %, addition of the gas-filled solution (foamer) with a surfactant, e.g. Neolas, at a concentration from 0.05 % to 5 % of the specific fluid flow rate in pre-wetting of coal (from 10 to 30 l/t) and injection of the resultant working fluid under pressure from 1.5 to 30 MPa. After the soak treatment for 24–96 h, coal seam is cut by shearer and sprayed with water (jets); whereupon liberated gas and methane interact with the foamer and make foam which isolates broken coal and reduces gas and dust release in mine air. Higher intensive mining leads to increasing gas liberation from broken coal. The gas-filled surfactant solutions block gas and dust emission both from exposed coal surface and broken coal particles. Thus, with a view to combating gas and dust hazards which are integrated and synergetic (boost each other) in coal mines, the integrated method of coal wetting with gas-filled solutions of surface active substances is experimentally substantiated. The method will ensure considerable mitigation of explosion risk in underground coal mining.

1. Mamaev V. I., Ibraev Zh. A., Ligay V. A. et al. Prevention of aeromethane-dust mixture blasts. Moscow : Nedra, 1990. 159 p.
2. Slastunov S. V., Yermak G. P. Choice Substantiation of Efficient Implementation of Degassing Methods in Case of Intensive Gas-bearing Coal Beds a Key Issue for Ensuring Coal Mine Methane Safety. Ugol. 2013. No. 1. pp. 21–24.
3. Lei Yang. A Mixed Element Method for the Desorption-Diffusion-Seepage Model of Gas Flow in Deformable Coalbed Methane Reservoirs. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2014. Vol. 2014.
4. Pinkun G., Yuanping C. Permeability Prediction in Deep Coal Seam: A Case Study on the No. 3 Coal Seam of the Southern Qinshui Basin in China. The Scientific World Journal. 2013. Vol. 2013.
5. Slastunov S. V., Yutyaev E. P., Mazanik E. V., Sadov A. P., Ponizov A. V. Mine test improved technology underground reservoir degassing with the use of hydraulic fracturing. Ugol. 2016. No. 11. pp. 32–37.
6. Kalimulina E. G., Temnikov V. V. Utilization of aspiration dusts in steelmaking production at “EVRAZ NTMK” JSC. Chernye Metally. 2018. No. 7. pp. 38–40.
7. Beloglazov I. I., Bazhin V. Yu. Simulation of aerodynamic flows of gas withdrawal from coke batteries. CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2017. Vol. 13. pp. 10–13. DOI: 10.17580/cisisr.2017.01.02
8. Slowik S. Analiza szybkości reakcji utleniania 955-elementowej próby węgli kamiennych z uwzględnieniem zagrożenia pożarowego. Przegląd Górniczy. 2016. Vol. 72, No. 2. pp. 23–33.
9. Strokova L. A. Methods of estimating surface settlement during driving of urban tunnels. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2010. Vol. 47, Iss. 3. pp. 92–95.
10. Purgina D. V., Strokova L. A., Kuzevanov K. I. Modeling hydrogeological conditions for antilandslide measures justification on the plot of the Kama river embankment in Perm. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2016. Vol. 327, No. 1. pp. 116–127.
11. Strokova L. A., Ermolaeva A. V., Golubeva V. V. The investigation of dangerous geological processes resulting in land subsidence while designing the main gas pipeline in South Yakutia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2016. Vol. 43.
12. Epifantsev O. G., Pletenchuk N. S. Rock Jointing. Theoretical Framework and Research Methods: Guidelines. Novokuznetsk, 2008. 41 p.
13. Rozantsev E. S., Taran N. P. Investigation of composition of hydrocarbon gases of Kuzbass coal layers for the purpose of the possible forecasting of their outburst hazard. Increasing of labor safety during the coal mining : collection of articles. Moscow : Mir gornoy knigi, 1990. pp. 88–95.
14. Lebedev V. S., Skopintseva O. V., Savelev D. I. Research of residual gas-bearing capacity of coal with thermal influence. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2014. No. 5. pp. 20–21.
15. Kolesnichenko I. E., Artemyev V. B., Kolesnichenko E. A., Cherechukin V. G., Lubomischenko E. I. The study of volatile matter yield effect on the coal dust explosion hazard. Ugol. 2016. No. 2. pp. 50–55.
16. Lebedev V. S., Skopintseva O. V. Residual coalbed gas components: composition, content, hazard. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 4. pp. 84–86. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.04.17
17. Skopintseva O. V., Ilyakhin S. V., Savelev D. I., Prokopovich A. Yu., Vertinskiy A. S. Substantiation of efficient parameters of dust-controlling processing of coal massif in mines. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2014. No. 5. pp. 17–20.