Journals →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2019 →  #2 →  Back

SECONDARY RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING
ArticleName Recycling of electrolytic aluminum production sweepings
DOI 10.17580/or.2019.02.07
ArticleAuthor Vasyunina N. V., Dubova I. V., Belousov S. V., Sharypov N. A.
ArticleAuthorData

Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk, Russia):

Vasyunina N. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, NVVasyuni-na@gmail.com
Dubova I. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, idubova@mail.ru
Sharypov N. A., Senior Lecturer, Nikita.Sharypov@gmx.com


LLC «RUSAL ITC» (Krasnoyarsk, Russia):
Belousov S. V., Head of Department, Stanislav.Belousov@rusal.com

Abstract

A method is proposed for extracting contaminating components from aluminum production sweepings for their subsequent recovery to the electrolyzer. The following processing system is proposed for the material: grinding – classification – reverse flotation – thickening. In order to ensure complete removal of silicon and iron oxides in the flotation of sweepings, Flotigam 7266 flotation agent by Clariant (Germany) is used, representing a mixture of primary fatty alkylamines. The removal of carbon particles is ensured through the use of pine oil mixed with kerosene. Flotation is carried out in a FML 0.3 flotation machine. The feed, flotation product and tails are analyzed to determine the content of carbon, aluminum, iron and silicon oxides using X-ray spectrometry, X-ray phase analysis and chemical assays. It is established that pro-cessing of the total mass of the material does not render a product with any acceptable contents of silicon and iron oxides. A phase analysis of various fractions of the feed material is carried out. It is proposed to process the material fractions containing the minimum amount of contaminants (such as carbon and silicon and iron oxides). Based on the X-ray spectrometry results for various material fractions, two fractions of +5 mm and –0.071 mm are selected for flotation. Processing of the –0.071 mm material renders a flotation product of the required grade and flotation alumina based on this product. In the processing of the coarse electrolyte-containing fraction (+5.0 mm), a product with a high fluorine content is obtained, indicating its high application prospects.

keywords Alumina-containing wastes, sweepings, electrolytic aluminum production, flotation of sweepings, cleaning of sweepings, recycling
References

1. U. S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2015. URL: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/aluminum/mcs-2015-alumi.pdf.
2. URL: http://www.world-aluminium.org/statistics/#data (accessed: 09.01.19).
3. Patrin R. K., Sizyakov V. M., Bazhin V. Y. Prospects of pyrometallurgical processing of technogenic waste of aluminum production. Izvestiya Vuzov. Tsvetnaya Metallurgiya. 2013. No. 6. pp. 61–63. DOI: 10.17073/0021-3438-2013-6-61-63.
4. Kondrat’ev V. V., Rzhechitskii E. P., Karlina A. I., Sysoev I. A., Shakhrai S. G. Recycling of electrolyzer spent carbon-graphite lining with aluminum fluoride regeneration. Metallurgist. 2016. Vol. 60, No. 5–6. pp. 571–575. DOI: 10.1007/s11015-016-0333-4.
5. Abdrakhimov V. Z. Use of aluminum-containing waste in production of ceramic materials for various purposes. Refractories and Industrial Ceramics. 2013. Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 7–16.
6. Nour Attia, Kareem M. Hassan, Mohamed I. Hassan. Environmental impacts of aluminum dross after metal extraction. Light Metals. Springer International Publishing, 2018. pp. 1155–1161.
7. Satish Reddy M., Neeraja D. Aluminum residue waste for possible utilisation as a material: a review. Sādhanā. 2018. Vol. 43, Iss. 8. Article:124. DOI: 10.1007/s12046-018-0866-2.
8. Cremiato R., Mastellone M. L., Tagliaferri C., Zaccariello L., Lettieri P. Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production. Renewable Energy. 2018. Vol. 124(C). pp. 180–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.033.
9. Haraldsson J., Johansson M. Review of measures for improved energy efficiency in production-related processes in the aluminium industry – From electrolysis to recycling. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018. Vol. 93. pp. 525–548. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.043.
10. Burdonov A. E., Barakhtenko V. V., Prokhorov K. V., Gavrilenko A. A. Results of studies of disintegration working indices for alumina-containing wastes. Obogashchenie Rud. 2018. No. 4. pp. 11–16. DOI 10.17580/or.2018.04.03.
11. Barkhatenko V. V., Burdonov A. E., Zelinskaya E. V., Volyanskiy V. V., Gavrilenko A. A. Cleaning of substandard alumina-containing product for use in the production of aluminum. Proc. of the XXIII International scientific and technical conference «Scientific basis and practice of ore and technogenic raw materials processing». Ekaterinburg: Fort Dialog-Iset’, 2018. pp. 201–204.
12. Maksimova M. A. Development of extraction method for contaminants of an alumina-feedstock in the aluminum industry. XXI Vek. Tekhnosfernaya Bezopasnost’. 2016. Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 53–64.
13. Vasyunina, N. V., Belousov, S. V., Dubova, I. V., Morenko, A. V., Druzhinin, K. E. Recovery of silicon and iron oxides from alumina-containing sweepings of aluminum production. Russian Journal of Non-ferrous Metals. 2018. Vol. 59, No. 3. pp. 230–236.
14. Rajabov Sh. Kh., Shoev I. S., Mukhamediev N. P., Ruziev J. R., Safiev A. H., Boboev H. E., Mirpochaev Kh. A., Safiev H. Complex processing of floury-, alumina-waste of aluminum production. Doklady Akademii Nauk Respubliki Tadzhikistan. 2014. Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 51–55.
15. Safiev H., Kabirov Sh. O., Azizov B. S., Mirpochaev Kh. A., Ruziev D. R., Boboev H. E., Radzhabov Sh. H. The тechnology of reception of cryolite and fluoride of aluminum from alumina-, fluorine-containing aluminum production wastes. Doklady Akademii Nauk Respubliki Tadzhikistan. 2011. Vol. 54, No. 10. pp. 845–850.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back