Gzhel State University, Elektroizolyator, Russia:

Razovskiy Yu. V., Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, renta11@yandex.ru

Moscow Witte University, Moscow, Russia:
Saveleva E. Yu., Deputy Head of Chair, Candidate of Economic Sciences

Education and Science Institute of Ecologcial Safety and Management, State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Kiev, Ukraine:
Ulitskiy O. A., Director, Doctor of Geological Sciences, Associate Professor

Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine:
Sukhina E. N., Senior Researcher, Candidate of Economic Sciences

For the first time, a geoeconomic concept is developed for generation, disposal and minimization of waste in the Arctic and other high-risk environmental management areas based on the ecological rent regulation, which is highly relevant and has regional, federal and international significance. On the basis of the recycling experience gained by industrial plants in the Onega, Ustyansky and other districts of the Arkhangelsk Region, recommendations are made for the marketable production using waste of the timber industry. The mining waste optimization model is considered within the framework of optimized reduction of overburden dumping. The model uses laser monitoring, slope optimization and reinforcement of pitwall rock mass in the Lomonosov diamond deposit, Severalmaz. The theoretical significance of the concept and its novelty are defined by the developed classification of ecological rent. The estimation methodology of ecological rent systematically combines standardization, analysis, comparison as well as economic and mathematical modeling. The practical significance is determined by the possibility of forming a regional strategy of waste and environmental impact minimization. The strategy is based on the noospheric scientific vision, rental approach, as well as on classification and estimation methodology of the ecological rent. Management of the rent, as well as socio-economic and environmental processes is proposed to implement using the experience of the Alaska Permanent Fund of the United States and the Government Pension Fund of Norway.

1. Vishnyakov Ya. D., Kiseleva S. P. Ecological imperative of the technological advancement in Russia : Monograph. Rostovon-Don : Terra, 2016.
2. Kiseleva S. P., Makarov P. V. Technological features of integrated municipal solid waste management at the modern stage. Scientific Outlook in the 21st Century. Achievement and Prospects : The 17th Scientific–Practical Conference Proceedings. Novosibirsk : Mezhdunarod. Nauch. Inst. Educatio, 2015. pp. 50–54.
3. Mar’ev V. A., Smirnova T. S., Kiseleva S. P. Eco-techno-parks as the framework for the integrated management of waste and secondary resources (international experience). Ecology-Oriented Risk Management and Safety of Socio-Economic, Socio-Politic and Nature-and-Technology Systems : Panel Discussion Proceedings. Moscow : GUU, 2017. pp. 102–110.
4. Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation. 2008. No 141. pp. 350–352.
5. Guerry A. D., Polasky S., Lubchenco J. et al. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015. Vol. 112, No. 24. pp. 7348–7355.
6. Kolokoltsev V. M., Vdovin K. N., Mayorova T. V., Ponomareva O. S. Ecological indicators in the system of non-financial reporting at industrial enterprises. CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2017. Vol. 13. pp. 4–10. DOI: 10.17580/cisisr.2017.01.01
7. Russ M. The probable foundations of sustainabilism: Information, energy and entropy based definition of capital, Homo Sustainabiliticus and the need for a “new gold”. Ecological Economics. 2016. Vol. 130. pp. 328–338.
8. Zhang S., Shi Q., Cheng M. Renewable natural capital, the biocapacity, and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Vol. 150. pp. 277–286.
9. Suhina O., Shults S., Tkach V., Popadynets N., Kamushkov O. Methodology of evaluating economic losses resulting from partial loss of the air ecosystem’s assimilative capacity. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. 2019. № 28(1). P. 188–198. DOI: 10.15421/111920.
10. Razovsky Yu. V., Suhina E. N. Classification of the mineral and ecological capital based on the sources of formation. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 10. pp. 22–25. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.10.05
11. Razovsky Yu. V., Sukhina E. N., Gorenkov E. Yu. Innovative methodological approaches to determination of mining and ecological rent. Nauka i ekonomika. 2013. Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 222–229.
12. Razovskiy Yu., Sukhina O. Estimation of Cost of “Work” of the Assimilative Potential of Ecosystems In Methodology of Determination of the Amount of the Ecological Rent. Science and education: trends and prospects : Collection of scientific articles. New York, USA : Ascona Publishing, 2018. pp. 190–195.
13. Semenov A. V., Rudenko Yu. S., Razovskiy Yu. V. et al. Strategic management of coastal reserves : Monograph. Moscow : Mosk. Univer. im. Vitte, 2016. Vol. 1 : Arctic rent, 176 p.
14. Severalmaz. Environment. Available at: http://www.severalmaz.ru/proizvodstvo/okruzhayushchaya-sreda (accessed: 16.09.2019).