ArticleName |
Evolution of VAC in the context of coal industry advance in the conditions of digitization in Russia |
ArticleAuthorData |
Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia:
Goosen E. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Economic Sciences
Kagan E. S., Head of Chair, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor
Federal Research Center for Coal and Coal Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kemerovo, Russian: Nikitenko S. M., Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, nsm.nis@mail.ru Pakhomova E. O., Junior Researcher |
Abstract |
The article shows the role and place of the modern coal industry in the stressresistant development in Russia, including economy diversification, as well as removal of technological, structural and infrastructural constraints. The theoretical framework for the studies is the concept of value-added chains. This article provides a detailed analysis of the formation of the concept and the advantages of its use for the coal industry. It is shown that under the influence of the fourth industrial revolution that has begun, new value-added chains appear—cooperative VAC. The new type of chains is structurally similar to the chains of the market type, the specificity of assets and equipment makes the relationship between the participants within such chains of added value is closer to the network interconnections. The analysis of global coal companies shows that the captive-type VAC (coal companies within the energy-generating and metallurgical holdings) are characteristic of the modern coal industry. It is demonstrated that the beginning of digitization of all industries has led to the growth of alternative technologies for coal processing, but the final consumer is represented mainly by metallurgical and energy-generating companies. The main causes of “inhibition” in transformation of the coal industry in Russia are: replacement of coal with cheaper gas, long distances for transportation of coal products within the country and abroad, accumulated infrastructure constraints for switching to Industry 4.0. It is recommended: to develop and implement transition from upward to downward connections by restructuring value-added chains, to modernize mines and equipment from Industry 3.0 to Industry 4.0, to add the chains with scientific engineering and design centers, as well as with innovation and experimentation sites that can design and implement hybrid coal mining technologies to ensure safety of mining and coal production stimulation.
The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 17-78-20218. |
References |
1. Available at: http://ac.gov.ru/files/content/1578/11-02-14-energostrategy-2035-pdf.pdf (accessed: 02.02.2019). 2. Gereffi G., Fernandez-Stark K. Global Value-added chain Analysis: A Primer (Second Edition). Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University. 2016. Available at: http://www.cggc.duke.edu/pdfs/Duke_CGGC_Global_Value_Chain_GVC_Analysis_Primer_2nd_Ed_2016.pdf (accessed: 02.02 2019). 3. Sturgeon T. J. How Do We Define VAC and Production Networks? IDS Bulletin. 2001. Vol. 32. No. 3. Р. 9–18. 4. Avdasheva S. B., Golikova V. V., Yakovlev A. A., Budanov I. A. Modernization of industries in Russia in the value-added chains (in terms of tube making and furniture trade). Ekonomicheskii zhurnal VESH. 2005. No. 3. pp. 361–377. 5. Park A., Nayyar G., Low P. Supply chain perspectives and issues: a literature review. Fung Global Institute and World Trade Organization. 2013. 234 p. 6. Ferrantino M. J., Koten E. E. Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global VAC. Technological innovation, supply chain trade, and workers in a globalized world. Global Value-added chain Development Report 2019. Geneva, Switzerland : World Trade Organization, 2019. pp. 103–119. 7. Dementiev V. E., Ustyuzhanina Е. V., Evsukov S. G. Digital transformation of VAC: “small curve” can become “scowling”. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2018. Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 58–77. 8. Andreeva T. V., Ermakova Zh. A. Chains forming of creation of product cost in the food industry. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2011. No. 1(120). pp. 108–113. 9. Zuev V. N., Ostrovskaya E. A., Dunaeva M. S. Inclusion of national economies in global VAC: Changing frameworks of external economic relations. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. 2014. No. 2(44). pp. 37–54. 10. Vdovin A. N. Building product VAC of enterprises of the fuel and energy complex in Russia. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2011. Vol. 10, Iss. 44. 11. Nikitenko S. M., Goosen E. V. Value added chains as instrument of development of coal branch. ECO. 2017. Vol. 9(519). pp. 104–124. 12. Vasil’ev Yu. N., Khaikin M. M., Periy I. O. Formation of integrated logistic chains of value in the coal industry in the Russian Federation. Technological Innovations and Special-Purpose Equipment : XI Russia Science-and-Practice Conference proceedings. Saint-Petersburg, 2019. pp. 158–162. 13. Porter M. E. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, 1998. 453 p. 14. Sturgeon T., Biesebroeck J. Effects of the crisis on the automotive industry in developing countries. A global value-added chain perspective. The World Bank, 2010. 31 p. 15. Gereffi G., Sturgeon T., Biesebroeck J. VAC, Networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography. 2008. Vol. 8(3). pp. 297–321. 16. Gereffi G. Global VAC and Development: Redefining the Contours of 21st Century Capitalism. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018. 17. Transition Report 2017–18. EBRD. Sustaining Growth. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London, 2017. Available at: https://www.ebrd.com/transition-report-2017-18 (accessed: 10.08.2019). 18. Chetverikova A. S. Global value added chains in ferrous metallurgy: Russian participation. World Economy and International Relations. 2018. Vol. 62, No. 8. рр. 97–103. 19. Singer H. The Distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review. May 1950, pp. 473–485. 20. Kondrat’ev V. Global VAC, Industry 4.0 and industrial policy. Journal of the New Economic Association. 2018. Vol. 3(39). pp. 170-177. 21. BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2019. Available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/xlsx/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-all-data.xlsx (accessed: 10.08.2019). 22. Kondrat’ev V. D. Global VAC in industries: common and specific features. World Economy and International Relations. 2019. Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 49–58. 23. Tarazanov I. G. Russia’s coal industry performance for January–December. Ugol. 2019. No. 3. pp. 64–79. 24. Nikitenko S. M., Goosen E. V., Pakhomova E. O., Kolevatova A. V. The VAC as an instrument of economy development in the region of raw-material orientation. Fundamental research. 2017. No. 10 (part 2). pp. 375–380. 25. Savon D. Yu., Zhaglovskaya A. V., Safronov A. E., Sala D. Development of patenting in coal industry. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 1. pp. 9–11. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.01.02 26. Shaydullina V. K., Pavlov V. P., Sinelnikova V. N., Efimova N. A., Novickaya L. Yu. Legal issues of patenting in the coal industry: challenges of the digital economy. Ugol. 2019. No. 1. pp. 58–62. 27. Mapping Global VAC. OECD. December 2012. 45 p. 28. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. The governance of global VAC. Review of International Political Economy. 2005. Vol. 12 (1). pp. 78–104. 29. Glinina O. I. The coal industry in Russia: 295 year history and new opportunities. Ugol. 2017. No. 10. pp. 4–10. 30. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420204008 31. Dvornikov L. T., Klishin V. I., Nikitenko S. M., Korneyev V. A. Experimental designs of a combined tool using superhard composite materials for effective destruction of mine rocks. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 1. pp. 22–26. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.01.05. |