Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  #4 →  Back

ECONOMY, ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
ArticleName Structural change in oil reserve asset management as a factor of federal budget income
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.04.06
ArticleAuthor Filimonova I. V., Komarova A. V., Provornaya I. V., Mishenin M. V.
ArticleAuthorData

Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia1; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia2 :

I. V. Filimonova, Chief Researcher1, Head of Chair2, Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, filimonovaiv@list.ru

 

Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia:
I. V. Provornaya, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Economic Sciences
M. V. Mishenin, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Economic Sciences


Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia:

A. V. Komarova, Senior Lecturer

Abstract

The study aims to review the stable trends in the hard-to-recover oil production as a factor of income from oil and gas reserves in the budgetary nomenclature. The authors have thoroughly examined the concessionality mechanism in the hard-to-recover reserve asset management in generation of income from oil and gas. It is shown that the tax regulations have experienced an essential modification in the recent decade, and the mining tax rate is calculated as the reference rate multiplied by different factors regarding changes in the market, geological, physicochemical and field characteristics and conditions of oil production. The impact analysis of the change in the oil industry structure in Russia shows that hard-to-recover reserves become increasingly more important. In 2018 the hard-to-recover oil production totaled 246 Mt which exceeded the previous year figure by 18 %. Worsening of mining conditions is accompanied by an increased loss in the income of the federal budget; however, the role of earnings from natural resources yet remains high. The long-term objective of reduction in the budget dependence on income from oil and gas is still unachievable due to high volatility of oil prices. It is shown that these trends will be connected with hard-to-recover reserves, while the regional role of the Arctic and East Siberia will only grow. As a consequence, the tax deductions will consistently rise. Furthermore, in the mid-term, it is planned to develop reserves and resources of the Bazhenov, Abalak, Khadum and Domanikov Formations, which will undoubtedly complicate fiscal mode of oil and gas tax.
The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Project No. 18-310-20010, and by the President of Russia, Grant No. NSH-2571.2020.6.

keywords Oil, production, concessional oil, mining tax, customs duty, Federal Budget, income from oil and gas, reserves, Arctic, hard-to-recover reserves
References

1. Eder L. V., Filimonova I. V., Nemov V. Yu., Provornaya I. V. Forecasting of Energy and Petroleum Consumption by Motor Transport in the Regions of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika regiona. 2017. Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 859–870.
2. Eder L. V., Filimonova I., Nemov V., Provornaya I. Forecasting Sustainable Development of Transport Sectors of Russia and EU: Energy Consumption and Efficiency. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2018. Vol. 8, Iss. 2. pp. 74–80.
3. Filimonova I. V., Eder L. V., Mishenin M. V., Mamakhatov T. M. Current state and problems of integrated development of mineral resources base in Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017. Vol. 84, Iss. 1. 012011. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/84/1/012011
4. Tsibulnikova M. R., Salata D. V., Drebot V. V., Vorozheykina E. A. Petroleum taxation: a comparison between Russia and Kazakhstan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2016. Vol. 43. 012089. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/43/1/012089
5. Weber J. G., Yongsheng Wang, Chomas M. A quantitative description of state-level taxation of oil and gas production in the continental U.S. Energy Policy. 2016. Vol. 96. pp. 289–301.
6. Dushin A. V., Yurak V. V. Authors’ approach to the Total Economic Value: Essentials, structure, evolution. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 1. pp. 11–15. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.01.03
7. Beer S., Loeprick J. Taxing income in the oil and gas sector – Challenges of international and domestic profit shifting. Energy Economics. 2017. Vol. 61.pp. 186–198.
8. Ikonnikova S., Gürcan Gülen, Browning J. Impacts of Price Differentials, Taxation, and Costs on Shale Gas Drilling: A Marcellus Case Study. SPE/IAEE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium. Houston, 2016. DOI: 10.2118/179985-MS
9. Ponkratov V. V., Pozdnyaev A. S. The oil production taxation in Russia – consequences of tax maneuver. Oil Industry. 2016. No. 3. pp. 24–27.
10. Development strategy for mineral reserves and mineral resources of the Russian Federation up to 2035. Approved by the Russian Federation Government, Order No. 2914-r as of December 22, 2018. Available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/WXRSEBj6jnRWNrumRkDakLcqfAzY14VE.pdf (accessed: 18.02.2020).
11. Lisovskiy N. N., Khalimov E. M. Classification of hard-to-recover reserves. Vestnik TsKR Rosnedra. 2009. No. 6. pp. 33–35.
12. Postnikov A. L. Hard-to-recover oil reserves management in Russia : Problems and modern solutions. Burenie i neft. 2018. No. 12. pp. 48–50.
13. Temporal criteria for rating oil as hard-to-recover reserves : Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation, Order No. 41 dated 13 February 1998. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901797072 (accessed: 18.02.2020).
14. Yashchenko I. G. Difficult-to-recover oils: physical and chemical properties and environmental impacts of production. Ekspozitsiya Neft Gaz. 2014. No. 1(33). pp. 30–35.
15. Shmelev P/ Hard-to-recover reserves as objective reality. Classification and mining of hard-torecover reserves. Sibirskaya neft. 2018. No. 2(149). pp. 17–23.
16. Sergeichev A. V., Vasilyev V. V., Zimin P. V., Stepanov A. V., Kuzovkov A. A. Analytical approaches to reserves recovery evaluation and long-term planning of investment in development. Oil Industry. 2017. No. 12. pp. 108–113.
17. Rabe B. G., Hampton R. L. Taxing Fracking: The Politics of State Severance Taxes in the Shale Era. Review of Policy Research. 2015. Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 389–412.
18. Weijermars R. Natural Resource Wealth Optimization: A Review of Fiscal Regimes and Equitable Agreements for Petroleum and Mineral Extraction Projects. Natural Resources Research. 2015. Vol. 24, Iss. 4. pp. 385–441.
19. Alekseeva N. A., Gaynanov I. I., Akhmetov A. I. Financial and economic effect of oil recovery enhancement subject to new calculation procedure of mining tax. Finansovaya ekonomika. 2018. No. 6. pp. 1015–1018.
20. Boyarko G. Yu., Zolotenkov Ya. V. Reproduction rate of mineral resources as the efficiency index of geological exploration. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018. No. 1. pp. 37–42. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.01.06
21. Kosova A. I. Investigation of the tax for mining mineral resources (NDPI) in Russia. Ekonomika i sotsium. 2018. No. 6(49). pp. 600–604.
22. Mansurov M. N., Tolstikov A. V., Astafev D. A., Naumova L. A. Prospects for expansion of oil and gas resources on the Sakhalin Island shelf in the 21st century. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2019. No. 1. pp. 4–8. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2019.01.01

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back