Журналы →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  №6 →  Назад

NORILSK NICKEL CELEBRATES ITS 85 ANNIVERSARY
GEOMECHANICAL STUDIES TO SUPPORT MINERAL MINING
Название Geomechanical survey procedure for Oktyabrsky mine
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.06.01
Автор Sabyanin G. V., Balandin V. V., Trofimov A. V., Kuzmin S. V.
Информация об авторе

Norilsk Nickel, Moscow, Russia:

G. V. Sabyanin, Head of Mining and Processing Office, Industrial Engineering Department, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

 

Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Branch, Norilsk, Russia:
V. V. Balandin, Director of Oktyabrsky mine

 

Gipronickel Institute, Saint-Petersburg, Russia:
A. V. Trofimov, Head of Physical and Mechanical Research Center, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, TrofimovAV@nornik.ru


Norilskgeologiya, Saint-Petersburg, Russia:
S. V. Kuzmin, Chief Geomechanical Engineer, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Реферат

The article describes the procedure and outputs of the geomechanical survey of enclosing rock mass in the Oktyabrsky mine field of Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. The stages of geotechnical information gathering are described. The mine mapping is accomplished in 46 underground excavations in compliance with the Rock Mass Quality Assessment Procedure adopted at Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. The estimates of rock mass quality were obtained using Q-system, Q-prime, GSI and RMR approaches. The RQD estimates were compared with fracture logs from 38 boreholes drilled in 2017–2018 in the west of the Oktyabrsky deposit to determine feasibility of indirect rock mass quality assessment by the characteristic of rock jointing. Geomechanical survey of 21 boreholes was performed in accordance with Code STO 00.12-11-2016 Detailed Geotechnical Core Description. The physical and mechanical test procedure of core samples from geomechanical boreholes is presented. All in all, 1400 core samples were tested. The in-situ physical and mechanical testing procedure of irregular shape samples of rocks taken in the areas of mine mapping is described. The rock mass jointing stereogram is presented as a case study of mine site No. 5 mapping data processing in Dips 7 Rocsciense. An approach to database generation with subsequent geomechanical modeling of Oktyabrsky mine in Micromine environment is introduced.
The authors appreciate participations of experts D. V. Lyalinov, A. E. Rumyantsev, T. K. Burdukov, S. G. Kokoev and I. S. Nevolin in this study.

Ключевые слова Geomechanical core logging, mine mapping, geomechanical database, physical and mechanical testing, geomechanical model of mineral deposit, Micromine
Библиографический список

1. Cheskidov V. V., Lipina A. V., Melnichenko I. A. Integrated monitoring of engineering structures in mining. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 2. pp. 26–31. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.02.05
2. Eremenko V. A., Neguritsa D. L. Efficient and active monitoring of stresses and strains in rock masses. Eurasian Mining. 2016. No. 1. pp. 21–24. DOI: 10.17580/em.2016.01.02
3. Read J., Stacey P. Guidelines for open pit slope design. Australia : CSIRО, 2009. 496 p.
4. Little M. J. Geotechnical strategy and tactics at Anglo Platinum’s PPRust open pit operation, Limpopo province, South Africa. Johannesburg, 2006. 190 p.
5. Geotechnical Considerations in Underground Mines : Guideline. Document No. ZME723QT. East Perth : Department of Industry and Resources, 1997. 67 p.
6. Mining. Micromine. Available at: https://www.micromine.com/micromine-mining-software/micromine-mining-module/ (accessed: 15.04.2020).
7. Cadastre of physical and mechanical properties of rocks at the mineral deposits in the Norilsk Industrial District. Saint-Petersburg : Gipronickel Institute, 2018.
8. Geomechanical survey: data acquisition, database generation and geomechanical modeling of Oktyabrsky mine of Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. Stage 1 : Report. Saint-Petersburg : Gipronickel Institute, 2018.

9. Aydan Ö., Ulusay R. Rock Mass Quality Rating (RMQR) System: Its Application to Estimation of Geomechanical Characteristics of Rock Masses and to Rock Support Selection for Underground Caverns and Tunnels. Rock Mechanics for Global Issues – Natural Disasters, Environment and Energy : 2014 ISRM International Symposium – 8th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium. Sapporo, 2014.
10. Barton N. R., Bar N. Introducing the Q-slope method and its intended use within civil and mining engineering projects. Future Development of Rock Mechanics : Proceedings of the ISRM Regional Symposium EUROCK 2015 & 64th Geomechanics Colloquium. Salzburg, 2015. pp. 157–162.
11. Bar N., Barton N. R., Ryan C. A. Application of the Q-slope method to highly weathered and saprolitic rocks in Far North Queensland. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering: From the Past to the Future : International Symposium of the International Society for Rock Mechanics. London : Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. Vol. 1. pp. 585–590.
12. Vaskou P. Structural Characterization of Faults and Fractures in Underground Works. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering: From the Past to the Future : International Symposium of the International Society for Rock Mechanics. London : Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. Vol. 1.
13. Laubscher D. H. A geomechanics classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 1990. Vol. 90, No. 10. pp. 257–273.
14. Bieniawski Z. T. Engineering Classification of Jointed Rock Masses. Transactions of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers. 1973. Vol. 15, No. 12. pp. 335–344.
15. Kuzmin E. V., Uzbekova A. R. Rock mass rating classifications and applications. GIAB. 2005. No. 5. pp. 181–185.
16. Singh B., Goel R. K. Rock Mass Classification: A Practical Approach in Civil Engineering. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science, 1999. 267 p.
17. Using the Q-system. Rock mass classification and support design : Handbook. Oslo : NGI, 2015. 54 p.
18. Hoek E., Brown E. T. Practical Estimates of Rock Mass Strength. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 1997. Vol. 34, Iss. 8. pp. 1165–1186.
19. Barton N. Application of Q-system and index tests to estimate shear strength and deformability of rock masses. Workshop on Norwegian Method of Tunneling. New Delhi, 1993. pp. 66–84.
20. Makarov A. B. Practical geomechanics : tutorial for mining engineers. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2006. 391 p.
21. GOST 24941–81. Rocks. Methods for determination of mechanical properties by pressing with spherical indentors. Moscow : IPK Izdatelstvo standartov, 2001. 16 p.
22. GOST 21153.7–75. Rocks. Method for determination of elastic longitudinal and diametrical waves rate spreading. Moscow : IPK Izdatelstvo standartov, 1981. 8 p.
23. Dips. Rocscience Inc., 2020. Available at: https://www.rocscience.com/software/dips (accessed: 15.04.2020).
24. Eremenko V. A., Aynbinder I. I., Patskevich P. G., Babkin E. A. Assessment of the state of rocks in underground mines at the Polar Division of Norilsk Nickel. GIAB. 2017. No. 1. pp. 5–17.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад