SpetsStroiEkspert, Moscow, Russia:

T. N. Dymbrenov, CEO, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, dtn@sste.ru
R. R. Nasibullin, Engineer
N. V. Bushtak, Engineer
V. I. Leizer, Senior Engineer

The city of Moscow is currently faced with the extremely aggravating problem connected with traffic. Hereupon, majority of transportation systems are being expanded and upgraded. Construction of new running tunnels and subway stations, road spans, crossovers, underground parking lots, etc. is in process. The new construction affects the existing development sites in the time of surplus fallout, which leads to emergency situations. It is required to provide geotechnical monitoring of soil mass in the influence zone of new construction. To this effect, the wireless online monitoring system has been designed and introduced into surveillance of building structures and soil mass. The system is meant for the integrated and continuous observation of a control object. The operation charts and advantages of the wireless monitoring system are presented. The introduction experience of the automated geotechnical monitoring in the process of construction is described. The observation of a railroad overpass used the tilt sensors and crack meters. The deformation monitoring in soil mass was carried out using borehole deviation devices and extensometers. It is demonstrated that the time of the measurement cycles is related with the position of the shield tunneling face relative to the measurement boreholes. The interpreted data analysis proves correlation of the measured and predicted deformations. The deformation propagation in depth of soil mass is characterized. The data analysis made it possible to predict deformations of ground surface and, thereby, to eliminate a potential accident during shield tunneling under the surface railroad.

1. SP 22.13330.2016. Foundations of buildings and structures (SNiP 2.02.01–83). Moscow : Standartinform, 2017. 162 p.
2. Barvashov V. A., Boldyrev G. G., Utkin M. M. Calculation of settlements and tilts of engineering structures taking into account uncertainty of foundation soil properties. Geotekhnika. 2016. No. 1. pp. 4–21.
3. Barvashov V. A., Boldyrev G. G., Kashirskiy V. I. Geological engineering survey data uncertainty and numerical modeling of behavior of a structure. Inzhenernye izyskaniya. 2015. No. 8. pp. 14–25.
4. Chernyshev S. N., Martynov A. M. The inaccuracy of interpolation at the construction of boundaries in the engineering geological soil profiles for the generation of calculated models of geological medium. Inzhenernye izyskaniya. 2017. No. 11. pp. 32–43.
5. SP 305.1325800.2017. Buildings and structures. Regulations for geotechnical monitoring in construction. Moscow : Standartinform, 2017. 61 p.
6. Rykova V. V. Geotechnical monitoring: documents analysis of russian and foreign databases. Stroitelstvo i tekhnogennaya bezopasnost. 2019. No. 15(67). pp. 199–208.
7. Ivanova A. V., Soloveva T. A., Bugakova T. Yu. Geotechnical monitoring of buildings and structures for the control and construction safety. Interexpo Geo-Sibir. 2019. Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 214–220.
8. Lomov P. O., Popov A. M., Kovaleva O. V., Spodareva L. A. Geotechnical monitoring of high-rise buildings. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobshcheniya. 2020. No. 4(55). pp. 86–93.
9. Brandi I. V., Barbosa M. R., Guimarães de Paula R., Araújo R. N., Vieira de Moura R. S., Mota de Lima H. Instrumented geotechnical monitoring of a natural cave in a near mine oper ation – Towards a sustainable approach to mining and preservation of speleological heritage. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. Vol. 239. 118040. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118040
10. Rocchi I., Gragnano C. G., Govoni L., Bittelli M., Gottardi G. Assessing the performance of a versatile and affordable geotechnical monitor ing system for river embankments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2020. Vol. 117. 102872. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2020.102872
11. Cheskidov V. V., Lipina A. V., Melnichenko I. A. Integrated monitoring of engineering structures in mining. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 2. pp. 18–21. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.02.05
12. Kudryavtsev S. A., Maocai Chgao, Bugunov S. A., Kotenko Zh. I., Shemyakin V. Yu., Bugunova Yu. A. Use of optical fiber technologies in geotechnical monitoring of transport facilities. Transport Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona. 2019. No. 4(21). pp. 50–54.
13. Yong Zheng, Zheng-Wei Zhu, Wang Xiao, Quan-Xiang Deng. Review of fiber optic sensors in geotechnical health monitoring. Optical Fiber Technology. 2020. Vol. 54. 102127. DOI: 10.1016/j.yofte.2019.102127
14. Hongkui Gong, Kizil M. S., Zhongwei Chen, Amanzadeh M., Ben Yang, Aminossadati S. M. Advances in fibre optic based geotechnical monitoring systems for underground excavations. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2019. Vol. 29, Iss. 2. pp. 229–238.
15. Hellmich M. Monitoring the infrastructure while working under railway tracks. Metro i tonneli. 2020. No. 2. pp. 48–53.