Journals →  Eurasian Mining →  2021 →  #1 →  Back

TRAINING OF PERSONNEL
ArticleName Modeling development mechanism of intelligent innovation potential of mining engineers
DOI 10.17580/em.2021.01.18
ArticleAuthor Prokopenko S. A., Dyagileva A. V., Ravochkin N. N., Shadrin V. G.
ArticleAuthorData

VostNII Science Center, Kemerovo, Russia1 ; Kuzbass State Technical University, Kemerovo, Russia2:

Prokopenko S. A.1,2, Leading Researcher, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, sibgp@mail.ru

 

Kuzbass State Technical University, Kemerovo, Russia:

Dyagileva A. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

 

Kuzbass State Technical University, Kemerovo, Russia1 ; Kuzbass State Agricultural Academy, Kemerovo, Russia2:

Ravochkin N. N.1,2, Associate Professor, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences

 

Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia:

Shadrin V. G., Associate Professor, Candidate of Economic Sciences

Abstract

It is found that present-day mining engineers have a low and disbalanced intelligent innovation potential as compared with the Soviet-era specialists. It is of the current concern to reveal the intelligent innovation potential development mechanism of the engineers in order to stimulate innovative advancement of coal mining companies to keep the achieved level of their competitive abilities. Using the dramatic but successful innovation activity of Mining Engineer N. A. Chinakal as an example, the model of step-wise formation of cogni-creative and visenvolitive constituents of the intelligent innovation potential is constructed. The model visualizes the development mechanism and shows a clear skewness of the potential of present mining engineers toward the cogni-creative constituent. The unique level and balance of Chinakal’s innovation potential is demonstrated. The logics of engagement of an engineer’s brainpower resources and the contents of transition stages in mental work is displayed by the model of orbiting disclosure of a mining engineer’s brainpower resources during an innovation process. The model explains how intellect grows and expands while creating and implementing an innovation. Three zones, which are identified in the intelligent innovation potential of an engineer, illustrate the engineer’s possible positions and behavior in the course of industrial renovation. The stages of elaboration of an engineer’s innovation abilities and the contents of these stages along the way from an idea to an innovation are described. Incipience of special mental forces and accumulation of qualitative changes at the end of the first successful innovation cycle results in formation of the cumulative quality named the inn-experience. Multiplication of success in the next innovation cycles in different geological conditions ensures growth and enrichment of the inn-experience. Together with the accumulated package of put forward but unimplemened inventions, as well as with the experience gained in commissioning of innovations proposed by other inventors, the inn-experience composes the intelligent innovation potential of an engineer. The developed models and algorithm present the mechanism of the intelligent innovation potential which is the high-value intangible assets for the self-improvement of an engineer and for the competitive recovery of a mining company.

keywords Mine, mining engineer, N. A. Chinakal, intelligent innovation potential, novelty, innovation, implementation, cogni-creative potential, visen-volitive potential, mechanism, model, abilities
References

1. Belkin V. N. Theory of the human capital assets in industry. Yekaterinburg : Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2010. 400 p.
2. Kilin A. B., Azev V. A., Kostarev A. S., Baev I. A., Galkina N. V. et al. Efficient development of a coal production association : Practice and methods. V. B. Artemiev (Ed.). Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2019. 280 p.
3. Volkov S. A. Stimulation of innovation activities and efficiency of the human capital assets of a mining company : Dissertation of Candidate of Sciences in Economics. Kursk : YUZGU, 2019. 130 p.
4. Secchi D., Cowley S. J. Modeling Organizational Cognition: The Case of Impact Factor. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 2018. No. 21(1). DOI: 10.18564/jasss.3628
5. Fiorio G. The Ontology of Vision. The Invisible, Consciousness of Living Matter. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016. Vol. 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00089. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00089/full (accessed: 27.08.2020).
6. Ribeiro-Soriano D., Berbegal-Mirabent J. Disseminating scientific research: a double-edged sword? Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2017. Vol. 15. pp. 380–390.
7. Grohman M. G., Ivcevic Z., Silvia P., Kaufman S. B. The Role of Passion and Persistence in Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2017. Vol. 11(4) pp. 376–385.
8. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scot P. et al. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2010. 90 р.
9. Mensky M. В. Intuition and quantum approach to the theory of consciousness. Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 46(2). рр. 65–77.
10. Artemev V. B., Kilin A. B., Galkin V. A., Makarov A. M. Mining company: the leader and the leadership. GIAB. 2016. Vol. S32. pp. 5–47.
11. Galkin V. A., Osharov A. V., Vorobeva O. V. Personnel of a mining company-key factor of production safety and efficiency enhancement. GIAB. 2015. Vol. S62. pp. 225–237.
12. Korkina T. A. Management of investments in the human capital of coal mines : Goals and means. Ugol. 2009. No. 8. pp. 52–55.
13. Fedorov A. V., Samarin S. V., Kuletskiy V. N., Makarov A. M., Labunskiy L. V. et al. Motivating performance evaluation as a personnel training tool at a coal mine. Ugol. 2011. No. 5. pp. 90–93.
14. Prokopenko S. A., Ludzish V. S., Li A. A. Recycling possibilities for reducing waste from cutters on combined cutter-loaders and road builders. Waste Management & Research. 2017. Vol. 35(12). рр. 1278–1284. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X17731154
15. Belkin V. N., Belkina N. A., Antonova O. A. Innovative activity of business managers as a condition for modernization of regional labor potential. Economy of region. 2018. Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 1327–1340.
16. Prokopenko S. A., Gritskevich T. I., Ravochkin N. N., Dyagileva A. V. The essence of the intelligent and innovation potential of a mining engineer. GIAB. 2020. No. 7. pp. 155–177. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-7-0-155-177
17. Prokopenko S. A., Sementsov V. V. Modeling the intellectual and innovative potential of mining engineers. Ugol. 2020. No. 7. pp. 71-76. DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2020-7-71-76
18. Shaydullina V. K., Pavlov V. P., Sinelnikova V. N., Efimova N. A., Novickaya L. Yu. Legal issues of patenting in the coal industry: challenges of the digital economy. Ugol. 2019. No. 1. pp. 58–62.
19. Yuzhakov V. F. Wanted : Innovators. Ugol Kuzbassa. 2013. No. 6. pp. 42-46.
20. Plakitkina L. S. Innovation stimulation in the coal mining industry in Russia. Gornaya promyshlennost. 2011. No. 3. pp. 4–8.
21. Zvorygin L. V., Kurlenya M. V. Nikolai A. Chinakal. Mining art – The life and faith. Novosibirsk : SO RAN, 2001. 184 p.
22. Nikolai A. Chinakal. Novosibirsk Regional Ethnography Portal. Available at: http://kraeved.ngonb.ru/node/5321 (accessed: 27.08.2020).

Full content Modeling development mechanism of intelligent innovation potential of mining engineers
Back