Satbayev University, Almaty, Kazakhstan:

Toktaruly B., Candidate for a Doctor’s Degree, starbaha@yandex.ru
Aben Y., Assistant, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
Suleimenov Sh. K., Student

Sokolskiy Institute of Fuel, Catalisys and Electrochemistry, Almaty, Kazakhstan:

Bayeshov A., Doctor of Chemical Sciences

One of the effective methods of mining low-grade uranium deposits is the in-situ leaching technology. On the other hand, in difficult geological conditions, this technology fails to provide the desired effect and increases duration of mining, which, eventually, evaluates production costs. Feasibility of increasing uranium content in pregnant solution and reducing production period is governed by ferric iron concentration in process solution. For increasing the ferric iron concentration and, thus, the content of uranium in pregnant solution in uranium in-situ leaching, it is proposed to saturate the leach solution with atmospheric oxygen using the Venturi tube. The lab-scale tests of core materials for determining dependence of the uranium content in the pregnant solution on the oxygen concentration in the leach solution prove the advantages of the proposed technology of uranium in-situ leaching. According to many researchers, the uranium recovery in the pregnant solution in in-situ leaching depends on the degree of saturation of the leaching solutions with oxygen capable to oxidize ferrous iron (Fe₂) to ferric iron (Fe₃) and, thereby, to stimulate oxidizability of the leaching environment. The objective of the studies was to determine parameters of saturation of process solutions with oxygen.

The authors express their sincere gratitude to Doctor of Engineering, Professor of the Mining Department at the Satbayev Kazakh National Technical University and Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Kazakhstan Kh. A. Yusupov for the auspices and fruitful advice in the course of this research.

1. Sukhodolov A. P. World’s supply of uranium: prospects for primary provision of atomic energy industry. Izvestiya IGEA. 2010. No. 4. pp. 166–169.
2. Boytsov A. Worldwide ISL Uranium Mining Outlook : Presentation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Uranium Raw Material for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production, Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues (URAM-2014). Vienna : IAEA, 2014. pp. 1–23.
3. Mark S. Pelizza, Craig S. Bartels. Introduction to uranium in situ recovery technology. Uranium for Nuclear Power. London : Woodhead Publishing, 2016. pp. 157–213. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100307-7.00007-7
4. Golik V. I., Stradanchenko S. G., Maslennikov S. A. The concept of obtaining metals by leaching. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Biological, engineering and earth sciences. 2018. No. 1. pp. 49–60.
5. Omarbekov Y., Yussupov Kh. Improving the technology of uranium mining under the conditions of high groundwater pressure. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2020. Vol.14, Iss. 3. pp. 112–118.
6. Filippov A. P., Nesterov Yu. V. Redox processes and stimulation of metal leaching. Moscow : Ore and Metals, 2009. 543 p.
7. Yusupov Kh. A., Aliev S. B., Dzhakupov D. A. et al. Application of ammonium bifluoride for chemical treatment of wells in underground uranium leaching. Gorniy Zhurnal. 2017. No. 4. pp. 57–60. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.04.11
8. Ovseychuk V. A., Zozulya A. M. Reduction of process losses of uranium during underground leaching due to the dissolution of uranyl hydroxide. Vestnik Zabaykalskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. 2019. Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 4–12.
9. Chervyakov N. M., Andreev A. V., Boyarintsev A. V. et al. Kinetic study of the oxidative dissolution of uo2 and u3o8 in aqueous sodium carbonate solutions. Uspehi v himii i himicheskoy tehnologii. 2020. Vol. 34, No. 9. pp. 34–36.
10. Pastukhov A. M. Application of synthetic oxidants for intensification of uranium in-situ leaching process: Final R&D report. Yekaterinburg : UrFU, 2013. 34 p.
11. Kaksonen A. H., Lakaniemi A.-M., Tuovinen O. H. Acid and ferric sulfate bioleaching of uranium ores. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121586
12. Koltunov V. S., Marchenko V. I. Kinetics of U(IV) oxidation with nitric acid with catalytical treatment by ions of ferric iron. Radiohimia. 1973. Vol. 15. No. 1. pp. 78–84.
13. Hodjiev S. K., Nazarov Kh. M., Ermatov K. A. et al. Effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide action as an oxidizer of uranium dioxide depending on the pH state. Doklady Akademii Nauk Respubliki Tadzhikistan. 2018. Vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 281–285.
14. Yusupov Kh. A., Aleshin A. P., Bashilova E. S. et al. Application of hydrogen peroxide to intensify in-situ leaching of uranium. Obogashchenie rud. 2021. No. 2. pp. 21–26. DOI: 10.17580/or.2021.02.04
15. Draft Federal Law N 584587-5 dated 10 October 2011 : Amendment of some statutes of the Russian Federation in terms of rate setting improvement. Available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/584587-5 (accessed: 02.03.2022).
16. Turaev N. S., Zherin I. I. Chemistry and technology of uranium. Moscow : Ore and Metals, 2006. 396 p. ISBN 5-98191-019-4
17. Tolstov E. A. Physicochemical geotechnologies of uranium and gold production in the Kyzylkum region. Moscow : MGU, 1999. 312 p.
18. Khalidilla Yussupov, Yerbolat Aben, Armanbek Omirgali, Azamat Rakhmanberdiy. Analyzing a denitration process in the context of underground well uranium leaching. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2021. Vol. 15, Iss. 1. pp. 127–133.