Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2023 →  #4 →  Back

GEOLOGY, SEARCH AND EXPLORATION OF MINERALS
ArticleName Appraisal of remnant uranium reserves by nuclear geophysical logging during in-situ leach mining
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2023.04.01
ArticleAuthor Gladyshev A. V., Solodov I. N.
ArticleAuthorData

VNIPIpromtekhnologii, Moscow, Russia:

A. V. Gladyshev, CEO, Gladyshev.A.V@vnipipt.ru

 

Atomredmetzoloto, Moscow, Russia:
I. N. Solodov, Director of Innovation and Technological Advance Programs

Abstract

Uranium production by in-situ leaching (ISL) includes traditional appraisal of uranium reserves per operating blocks and ore bodies by means of regular measurement of the production well yield and uranium content of pregnant solutions. The mathematical geotechnology modeling using physicochemical hydrodynamics produces somewhat erroneous results as any geological modeling does. The errors are connected with the impossibility to take into account nonuniformity of properties and composition of geological environment, as well as with the time-lapse monitoring of the production well yield and uranium content of pregnant solution. The geophysical study carried out in mined-out operating blocks has revealed that anomalous gamma background remains round its initial level even after uranium recovery at a level of 80 % (sometimes 90 %) of the planned production level. It is possible to assess the rate of recovery per ore body areas during ISL and to verify a geotechnology model by integrating the gamma logging and the prompt fission neutron logging during monitor well drilling, emergency redrilling or in construction of extra process wells for densening the process well pattern. As a case-study of specific operating ISL blocks in Khiagda uranium ore province, the article illustrates application of the package of methods including the mathematical geotechnology modeling and reconstruction of initial uranium content by the gamma logging data and from direct estimation of remnant uranium by the prompt fission neutron logging. The integrated use of these methods offers a geoproduction engineer a unique opportunity to control and stimulate ISL towards complete uranium recovery and effective subsoil management.

keywords Geotechnology modeling, gamma logging, prompt fission neutron logging, process well, remnant uranium content, in-situ leach mining
References

1. Solodov I. N., Kamnev E. N. (Eds.). Uranium Geotechnology (Russian Experience). Moscow : KDU, 2017. 576 p.
2. Toktaruly B., Bayeshov A., Aben Y., Suleimenov Sh. K. Effect of process solution saturation with oxygen on uranium in-situ leaching performance. Eurasian Mining. 2022. No. 2. pp. 50–53. DOI: 10.17580/em.2022.02.12
3. Noskov M., Solodov I., Kesler A., Terovskaya T. Groundwater contamination and selfpurification at uranium production by the in-situ leaching process. International Symposium on Uranium Raw Material for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production, Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues (URAM-2018). Vienna, 2018. pp. 307–310.
4. Seredkin M. Overview of In-Situ Recovery for non-uranium metals. Alta, 2019. 26 p.
5. Uranium 2018: Resources, Production and Demand: A Joint Report by the NEA and IAEA. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2019. 460 p.
6. Nao Shen, Jun Li, Yongfan Guo, Xiaochun Li. Thermodynamic Modeling of In Situ Leaching of Sandstone-Type Uranium Minerals. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2020. Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 2017–2031.
7. Tolkachev V. A., Maynikov D. V., Paskhin N. P. Understanding the clarification process applicable to injection solutions generated by uranium in-situ leaching sites. Tsvetnye Metally. 2019. No. 6. pp. 39–44. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2019.06.06
8. Noskov M. D. Intelligence control technology for uranium production by in-situ leaching. MINEX Russia : XIV Geological Forum. Moscow, 2018.
9. Khaykovich I. M., Mats N. A., Ganichev G. I. Nuclear Logging Methods for Uranium Deposits. Saint-Petersburg : FGUNPP Geologorazvedka, 2017. 314 p.
10. Khaykovich I. M., Ganichev G. I. Prompt Fission Neutron Logging Manual for Uranium Deposits Using KND-M Procedure and Equipment (AINK-49 Versions). Saint-Petersburg : FGUNPP Geologorazvedka, 2014. 61 p.
11. Gladyshev A. V. Equipment and method for direct determination of uranium in Khiagda ore province in in-situ leaching. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2023. No. 2. pp. 39–43. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2023.02.06
12. Solodov I. N. (Ed.). In-Situ Uranium Leaching in Permafrost Zone. Moscow–Chita : ZetaPrint, 2022. 183 p.
13. Solodov I. N., Zelenova O. I., Shugina G. A. Technogenic geochemical barriers in the orebearing horizons of uranium hydrogenic deposits. Geokhimiya. 1994. No. 3. pp. 415–432.
14. Karamushka V. P., Kamnev E. N., Kuzin R. E. Recultivation of the objects of mining and processing of uranium ores. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2014. 183 p.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back