ArticleName |
Treatment of mine drain water at Dzhida tungsten–molybdenum deposit by natural sorbents |
Abstract |
Environmental pollution with acid mine waters remains a challenge for the sustainable development of the mining industry. The article describes the experimental treatment of mine drain water at the Dzhida tungsten–molybdenum deposit in the Republic of Buryatia to remove metal ions and suspended solids using local natural materials. The natural materials were selected to be rocks from the adjacent deposits, namely, montmorillonite clay, zeolite-containing tuff, limestone, volcanic slag, serpentine, calcite, quartzite, coal and coal ash. It is concluded that the neutralizing ability of these materials is the determining factor in the removal of metal ions by means of precipitation of hydroxides. Lead ions are removed almost totally, while tungsten ions are removed worse. Further, it is found that strength characteristics of mordenite-containing tuff, volcanic slag, serpentine, calcite and quartzite enable using them as filtering materials. Since removal of suspensions from mine water in columns was more efficient with zeolite-containing tuff and volcanic slag, the latter were included in the experiments to select the optimal fractions and water flow rate. In the dynamic mode, zeolite-containing tuff demonstrated the higher retention capacity of metal ions of zinc, tungsten, cadmium and copper. To assess saturation of the filtrate with the elements from the matrix of zeolite-containing tuff and volcanic slag after contact with distilled water, the chemical analysis of the aqueous extract was carried out using the ICP-MS method. It was revealed that Na ions were leached in the greatest amount, while the leached amount of Mg, Al, K, Ca, Ti, Fe, B, Mn, P, Rb, Zr, Li, V, Cu, Zn, Ga, Se, Nb, Mo, Cs , Ba, Sn, W, Pb, Be, Sc, Co, Ni, Ge, As, Cd, Sb, Re, Tl, Bi, Th and U was smaller. In the contact of zeolite-containing tuff with 20 % water solutions of chlorhydric acid as against distilled water and alkaline solutions, removal of aluminum and silicon ions of zeolite framework was the least.
The work was carried out within the framework of the state task of the Geological Institute of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (project АААА-А21-121011890033-1). |
References |
1. Tabelin C. B., Corpuz R. D., Igarashi T., Villacorte-Tabelin M., Alorro R. D. et al. Acid mine drainage formation and arsenic mobility under strongly acidic conditions: Importance of soluble phases, iron oxyhydroxides/oxides and nature of oxidation layer on pyrite. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2020. Vol. 399. 122844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122844 2. Borden R. K., Brown P. L., Sturgess S. Geochemical and hydrological evolution o f mine impacted waters at the Argyle Diamond Mine, Western Australia. Applied Geochemistry. 2022. Vol. 139. 105253. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105253 3. Santofimia E., López-Pamo E., Palomino E. J., González-Toril E., Aguilera Á. Acid rock drainage in Nevado Pastoruri glacier area (Huascarán National Park, Perú): hydrochemical and mineralogical characterization and associated environmental implications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017. Vol. 24, Iss. 32. pp. 25243–25259. 4. Chmykhalova S. V. Effectiveness evaluation of mining as a natural and technical system with a decrease in the content of a useful component of the ore-raw material base. Eurasian Mining. 2021. No. 2. pp. 36–40. DOI: 10.17580/em.2021.02.08 5. van Veenhuyzen B., Tichapondwa S., Hörstmann C., Chirwa E., Brink H. G. High capacity Pb(II) adsorption characteristics onto raw- and chemically activated waste activated sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021. Vol. 416. 125943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125943 6. Takahiko Arima, Ryosuke Sasaki, Takahiro Yamamoto, Carlito Baltazar Tabelin, Shuichi Tamoto et al. Effects of Environmental Factors on the Leaching and Immobilization Behavior of Arsenic from Mudstone by Laboratory and In Situ Column Experiments. Minerals. 2021. Vol. 11, Iss. 11. 1220. DOI: 10.3390/min11111220 7. Haiyan Liu, Huaming Guo, Olivier Pourret, Zhen Wang, Maohan Liu et al. Geochemical signatures of rare earth elements and yttrium exploited by acid solution mining around an ion-adsorption type deposit: Role of source control and potential for recovery. Science of the Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 804. 150241. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150241 8. Dushin A . V., Ignatуeva M. N., Yurak V. V., Ivanov A. N. Economic evaluation of environmental impact of mining: ecosystem approach. Eurasian Mining. 2020. No. 1. pp. 30–36. DOI: 10.17580/em.2020.01.06 9. Kuzin E. N., Kruchinina N. E. Production of complex coagulants based on mineral concentrates and their use in water treatment. Obogashchenie Rud. 2019. No. 3. pp. 43–48. DOI: 10.17580/or.2019.03.07 10. Arefieva O. D., Tregubova V. G., Gruschakova N. V., Grinenko E. F. Removal of metals from technogenic waters from abandoned coal mines using geochemical barriers. Water Practice and Technology. 2019. Vol. 14, Iss. 3. pp. 560–569. 11. Safonov A., Popova N., Andrushenko N., Boldyrev K., Yushin N. et al. Investigation of materials for reac tive permeable barrier in removing cadmium and chromium(VI) from aquifer near a solid domestic waste landfill. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021. Vol. 28, Iss. 4. pp. 4645–4659. 12. Merchichi A., Hamou M. O., Edahbi M., Bobocioiu E., Neculita C. M. et al. Passive treatment of acid mine drainage from the Sidi-Kamber mine wastes (Mediterranean coastline, Algeria) using neighbouring phosphate material from the Djebel Onk mine. Science of the Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 807. 151002. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151002 13. Adra A., Morin G., Ona-Nguema G., Brest J. Arsenate and arsenite adsorption onto Al-containing f errihydrites. Implications for arsenic immobilization after neutralization of acid mine drainage. Applied Geochemistry. 2016. Vol. 64. pp. 2–9. 14. Gaskova O. L., Kabannik V. G. Experimental Studies on Heavy Metal Sorption by Natural Clays Aimed at Drain Water Purification. Chemistry for Sustainable Development. 2009. Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 351–361. 15. Yerbolov S., Daumova G. Waste Water Purification from Metal Ions by Ultra-Dispersed Natural Sorbents. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2022. Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 43–50. 16. Ajala M. A., Ambali Saka Abdulkareem, Jimoh Oladejo Tijani, Abdulsalami Sanni Kovo. Adsorptive behaviour of rutile p hased titania nanoparticles supported on acid-modified kaolinite clay for the removal of selected heavy metal ions from mining wastewater. Applied Water Science. 2022. Vol. 12. 19. DOI: 10.1007/s13201-021-01561-8 17. Flieger J., Kawka J., Płaziński W., Panek R., Madej J. Sorption of Heavy Metal Ions of Chromium, Manganese, Selenium, Nickel, Cobalt, Iron from Aqueous Acidic Solutions in Batch and Dynamic Conditions on Natural and Synthetic Aluminosilicate Sorbents. Materials. 2020. Vol. 13, Iss. 22. 5271. DOI: 10.3390/ma13225271 18. Sabadash V., Gumnitsky J., Lyuta O. Combined Adsorption of the Copper and Chromium Cations by Clinoptilolite of the Sokyrnytsya Deposit. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2020. Vol. 21, Iss. 5. pp. 42–46. 19. Nikashina V. A. Permeable reactive barriers as a way to protect the environment from pollutions. Natural sorbents for solving environmental problems. Mathematical modeling and calculation of processes. Review. Sorbtsionnye i khromatograficheskie protsessy. 2019. Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 289–304. 20. Suprun V. A., Shiryaeva M. A. Mathematical justification of natural mineral sorbents mixture efficiency for low mineralized drainage water treatment depending on temperature. Ekologiya i vodnoe khozyaystvo. 2020. No. 4(7). pp. 1–11. 21. Research O. Handbook of Electrode Technology. Orion Research Inc., 1982. 45 p. 22. Breck D. W. Zeolite Molecular Sieves: structure, chemistry, and use. New York : John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1974. 771 p. |