Ural State Mining University, Yekaterinburg, Russia:

Ignatyeva M. N., Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences
Yurak V. V., Associate Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, vera_yurak@mail.ru
Dushin A. V., Rector, Doctor of Economic Sciences

The mess in evaluation approaches to nature and the disparity of evaluation results are the reasons for improving the evaluation process and streamlining the economic valuation methods. The aim ofthe research is to a nalyze the existing economic valuation methods of natural resources and ecosystem services and to improve the evaluation process to increase the level of objectivity and comparability of the evaluation results. The research methods are the comparative analysis, comparison, grouping, averaging, analogy method. The studies reveal the stage-wise evolution of the evaluation process in ecological economics and environmental economics, the sequence of the emergence of new methods and the external factors that cause these changes. The latter include: the actualization of economic valuation of ecosystem services due to the appearance of ecosystem approach; the emergence of a new object of evaluation as the natural capital, combining natural resources and ecosystem services; creation of a new valuation model defined by the concept of total economic value, and the transition to market. The evaluation process becomes more complex because of a socio-economic approach to economic valuation, which requires taking into account possible social and environmental consequences that reduce the value of the object of valuation. The paper contains the analysis of the available classifications of economic valuation methods and offers the author’s classification, which assumes the usage of four classification criteria, including: the nature of evaluation, the basis of evaluation, the evaluation techniques and the attitude to the market. The qualitative valuation using a point system is considered as an auxiliary stage to the monetary assessment. The identified trends in the change in the methods of economic evaluation and the author’s classification of economic valuation methods can help improve the evaluation process and increase the reliability and comparability of evaluation results.

1. Kunitsin L. F., Muhina L. I., Preobrazhenskiy V. S. Some general issues of technological evaluation of natural systems in territorial engineering. Moscow : Nauka, 1969. No. 1. pp. 38–49.
2. Volodomonov N. V. Mining rent and mineral appraisal concept. Moscow : Metallurgizdat, 1959. 80 p.
3. Temporal standard procedure of economic evaluation of mineral deposits. Moscow : Preyskurantizdat, 1980. 30 p.
4. Economic evaluation of natural resources. Review of accepted articles. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 1969. No. 1. pp. 75–110.
5. Tishkova A. A. Economics of biodiversity, handbook. Moscow : Proekt GEF Sohranenie bioraznoobraziya RF, 2002. 604 p.
6. Astahova A. S., Tota M. Social and economic issues of effective management of mineral resources. Moscow : Nedra, 1985, 272 p.
7. Kozakov E. M., Economic justification of mining and processing projects. Moscow : Nedra, 1987. 208 p.
8. Kozakov E. M., Pahomov V. P., Ignatyeva M. N. Social and economic justification of mineral mining. Yekaterinburg : UrO RAN, 1992. 112 p.
9. Tatarkina A. I., Ignatyeva M. N., Dushin A. V. Development of a system conception in nature potential management in the underexplored northern areas. Yekaterinburg : IE UrO RAN, 2015. 317 p.
10. Dushin A. V., Ignatyeva M. N., Yurak V. V. et al. Economic evaluation of environmental impact of mining: ecosystem approach. Eurasian Mining. 2020. No. 1. pp. 30–36.
11. Arias-Arévalo P., Gomez-Baggethun E., Martin-Lopez B. et al. Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. Environmental Values. 2018. Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 29–53.
12. Costanza R. Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. Ecosystem Services. 2020. Vol. 43. 101096.
13. Schaub S., Finger R., Leiber F., Probst S., Kreuzer M. et al. Reply to: Results from a biodiversity experiment fail to represent economic performance of semi-natural grasslands. Nature Communications. 2021. Vol. 12. 2124.
14. Ignatyeva M., Yurak V., Logvinenko O. A new look at the natural capital concept: Approaches, structure, and evaluation procedure. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12, No. 21. pp. 1–21.
15. Badeeb R. A., Lean H. H., Clark J. The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey. Resources Policy. 2017. Vol. 51. pp. 123–134.
16. Laporta L., Domingos T., Marta-Pedroso C. It’s a keeper: Valuing the carbon storage service of Agroforestry ecosystems in the context of CAP Eco-Schemes. Land Use Policy. 2021. Vol. 109. 105712.
17. Qiao H., Wang C., Chen M., Su C. J., Tsai C. K. et al. Hedonic price analysis for high-end rural homestay room rates. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2021. Vol. 49. pp. 1–11.
18. Bobylev S. N., Goryacheva A. A. Identification and assessment of ecosystem services: the international context. International Organisations Research Journal. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 225–236.
19. Tikhonova T. V. Environmental and economic assessment of water regulation function of rural territories in the Republic of Komi. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2017. Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 209–226.
20. Tsibulnikova M. R. Inclusion and evaluation of natural capital in territorial administration. Tomsk : TPU, 2018. 164 p.
21. Yurak V. V. Theoretical and methodical approach to evaluation of social value of natural resources: Synopsys Cand. Econ. Sci. Dissertation. Yekaterinburg : Mining University 2017. 258 p.
22. Artemenkov A. I., Medvedeva O. E. Cost estimation of water resources of Russia by water rent. Imuschestvenniye otnosheniya v RF. 2017. No. 8(191). pp. 62–73.
23. Fomenko G. A., Fomenko M. A., Loshadkin K. A. et al. Accounting and assessment of ecosystem services of Novokuznetsk coal-mining area (Kemerovo oblast). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2019. No. 3. pp. 88–97.
24. Fomenko G. A., Fomenko M. A., Loshadkin K. A. et al. Money value of natural resources, subjects of nature and ecosystem services in biodiversity preservation and management : Regional experience. Textbook for practitioners. Yaroslavl : KADASTR, 2002. 80 p.