Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia¹ ; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia²

Filimonova I. V.^1,2, Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, filimonovaiv@list.ru
Kuznetsova E. A.^1,2, Researcher, Candidate of Economic Sciences
Nemov V. Y.^1,2, Associate Professor, Candidate of Economic Sciences
Provornaya I. V.^1,2, Associate Professor, Candidate of Economic Sciences

In modern conditions of geopolitical instability, the problem of developing regional space to strengthen territorial integrity and ensure energy security is becoming increasingly important. The organization of mineral resource centers (MRC) is one of the effective forms of spatial development, especially for the regions of the Arctic zone. MRC contribute to solving the problems of integrated development of energy resources and the formation of a transport and logistics framework for poorly studied territories, which governs the effective advancement of the regional economy. The article systematizes the theoretical foundations for the development of MRC and updates the prerequisites for their formation in the Arctic. A conceptual scheme of territorial development is proposed with the allocation of the Arctic MRC in the north of the Krasnoyarsk Krai, a financial and economic model is built, an assessment of the main production and technical indicators is made, and the criteria for investment attractiveness are calculated. It is shown that the expediency of organizing the Arctic MRC is defined primarily by the strategic goals and objectives of the development of the Arctic zone at the federal level, and economic efficiency — by the development of a multi-level transport and logistics infrastructure. At the same time, despite large-scale capital investments and their long payback, the authors substantiate feasibility of developing the Arctic MRC through a high multiplier effect and propose a system for its assessment on the national, regional and corporate scales.
The study was supported by the President of the Russian Federation, Grant No. NSH-1280.2022.2, and by the Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, SB RAS, Project No. FWZZ-2022-0013.

1. Goldsmit J., Nudds S. H., Stewart D. B., Higdon J. W., Hannah C. G. et al. Where else? Assessing zones of alternate ballast water exchange in the Canadian eastern Arctic. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2019. Vol. 139. pp. 74–90.
2. Kinnear S., Ogden I. Planning the innovation agenda for sustainable development in resource regions: A central Queensland case study. Resources Policy. 2014. Vol. 39. pp. 42–53.
3. Chen Y., Danning Z. Multiscale assessment of the coupling coordination between innovation and economic development in resource-based cities: A case study of Northeast China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Vol. 318. pp. 32–44.
4. Doel R. E., Wråkberg U., Zeller S. Science, Environment, and the New Arctic. Journal of Historical Geography. 2014. Vol. 44. pp. 2–14.
5. Eliasson K., Ulfarsson G. F., Valsson T. et al. Identification of development areas in a warming Arctic with respect to natural resources, transportation, protected areas, and geography. Futures. 2017. Vol. 85. pp. 14–29.
6. Klusacek P., Charvatova K., Navratil J., Krejcí T., Martinat S. Regeneration of post-agricultural brownfield for social care needs in rural community: Is there any transferable experience? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022. Vol. 19(1). pp. 82–90.
7. Martinat S., Dvorak P., Frantal B. Klusacek P., Kunc J. et al. Sustainable urban development in a city affected by heavy industry and mining? Case study of brownfields in Karvina, Czech Republic. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 118. pp. 78–87.
8. Frei R., Frei K. M., Kristiansen S. M., Jessen S., Schullehner J. et al. The link between surface water and groundwater-based drinking water–strontium isotope spatial distribution patterns and their relationships to Danish sediments. Applied Geochemistry. 2020. Vol. 121. ID 104698.
9. Filimonova I. V., Komarova A. V., Kazanenkov V. A. et al. The special role of the Arctic. Development of the Arctic regions of Russia, taking into account the influence of the oil and gas complex. Oil and Gas Vertical. 2021.
No. 3-4(482). pp. 21–32.
10. Filimonova I. V., Nemov V. Yu., Mishenin M.V. Current Trends in the Development of the World Oil Market. Oil and Gas Vertical. 2021. No. 15-16(490). pp. 36–45.
11. Donskoy S. E., Grigoriev M. N. Approaches to the allocation of industrial resource centers of oil and the possibility of their resource base. Actual Problems of Oil and Gas Geology. 2010. No. 5. pp. 24–28.
12. Rogacheva E. A., Prokofiev A. I., Rogachev I. V. Energy supply of the territories of the Russian Arctic: Problems and prospects. V International Conference Proceedings in Honor of the Siberian State Automobile and Highway University’s 90^th Anniversary — Architectural and Construction and Road Transport Facilities: Problems, Prospects, Innovations. Omsk, 2021. pp. 453–456.
13. Veretennikov N. P. Formation and development of logistics infrastructure in the regions of the Arctic. North and the Market: The Formation of an Economic Order. 2019. Vol. 1(63). pp. 89–98.
14. Provornaya I. V., Filimonova I. V., Komarova A. V., Zemnukhova E. A. Patterns of development of oil and gas resource regions of Russia, taking into account transport provision (end). Ecological Bulletin of Russia. 2020. No. 2. pp. 20–24.