Journals →  Chernye Metally →  2025 →  #3 →  Back

15th anniversary of Polytechnic Institute of Tula State University
ArticleName Durability analysis of steel metal structures of hoisting machines at the design preparation stage of production
DOI 10.17580/chm.2025.03.03
ArticleAuthor A. V. Antsev, V. Yu. Antsev, A. V. Vorobyov, A. S. Tolokonnikov
ArticleAuthorData

Tula State University, Tula, Russia
A. V. Antsev, Dr. Eng., Associate Prof., Head of the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, e-mail: a.antsev@yandex.ru
V. Yu. Antsev, Dr. Eng., Prof., Head of the Dept. head of the Сhair for Transport and Technological Machines and Processes, e-mail: anzev@yandex.ru
A. S. Tolokonnikov, Cand. Eng., Associate Prof., Dept. of Transport and Technological Machines and Processes, e-mail: tolokonnikov@list.ru


Mashinvestholding, Donskoy, Russia

A. V. Vorobyov, Cand. Eng., Deputy Chief Engineer of the Project, e-mail: super-worobyov-av@yandex.ru

Abstract

The reliability and safety of operation of hoisting machines are largely determined by the quality of performance of steel structures, which necessitates the analysis of their reliability. Moreover, this analysis should be carried out at the stage of design and technological planning of the life cycle of the hoisting machine. Reliability analysis as applied to bridge-type hoisting machines is usually performed for critical elements of steel structures, the occurrence of fatigue cracks in which can lead to catastrophic consequences and indicates the exhaustion of the resource of the structure as a whole. These elements of hoisting machines include connections of the main and end beams, fastenings of running wheels, the middle of the main beams, metal structures of cargo bogies. Therefore, this paper proposes an engineering method for analyzing the reliability of steel structures of bridge-type hoisting machines at the stage of design preparation of production, which allows assessing the ability of the hoisting machine to meet the established requirements for durability, determined by the expected number of loading cycles until the crack length in the middle of the main beam of the bridge-type hoisting machine reaches a critical size. Moreover, the critical crack length and its growth rate in the method are calculated based on the stress intensity factor, for the determination of which, based on finite element modeling, the corresponding dependencies on the relative crack size and stresses within the boundaries of the elastic-plastic damage accumulation zone are obtained. Practical application of the proposed method will reduce the operating costs of the designed hoisting machine.

keywords Steel structure, hoisting machine, reliability analysis, durability, durability prediction, crack resistance, stress intensity factor
References

1. Tang G., Shi C., Wang Y., Hu X. Strength analysis of the main structural component in ship-toshore cranes under dynamic load. IEEE Access. 2019. Vol. 7. pp. 23959–23966.
2. He W., Lin Z., Li W. et al. The comprehensive safety assessment method for complex construction crane accidents based on scenario analysis – A case study of crane accidents. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2025. Vol. 199. pp. 110716–110724.
3. Nykyforchyn H., Pustovyi V., Zvirko O. et al. Analysis of operational factors affecting the serviceability of seaport hoisting and transporting equipment. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2022. Vol. 41. pp. 326–332.
4. Slobodyansky M. G. Prediction of durability of a drum pelletizer based on the strength criterion of non-driven support rollers at the design and operation stage. Chernye Metally. 2023. No. 9. pp. 66–74.
5. Antsupov A. V. (Jr.), Antsupov A. V., Antsupov V. P. Estimation and assurance of machine component design lifetime. Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 150. pp. 726–733. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.094
6. Usataya T. V., Deryabina L. V., Kurzaeva L. V., Usaty D. Yu. Application of VR/AR technologies in the design of metallurgical equipment. Chernye Metally. 2020. No. 9. pp. 56–61.
7. Okrepilov V. V. Quality Management: textbook. Saint Petersburg : Izdatelstvo Politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2013. 650 p.
8. GOST R ISO 9001–2015. Quality Management Systems. Requirements. Introduced: 01.11.2015.
9. ISO/ТО 10017–2015. Quality management Guidance on statistical tehniques for 9001:2015. Introduced: 01.07.2005.
10. Seliverstov G. V., Butyrsky S. N., Voblikova Yu. O. Analysis of the stress-strain state of elements of metal structures of hoisting machines. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2009. Iss. 2. Part 1. pp. 123–126.
11. Seliverstov G. V., Antsev V. Yu., Antseva N. V., Kolomiets K. S. Damage assessment of metal structures of hoisting machines under the combined action of corrosion and fatigue and optimization of their diagnosis. Chernye Metally. 2020. No. 3. pp. 52–57.
12. Sokolov S. A., Tulin D. E. Methodology for calculating the stress intensity factor for a crack in the stress concentrator zone. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2020. No. 5. pp. 328–335.
13. Sokolov S. A. Metal structures of hoisting and transport machines. Saint Petersburg : Politekhnika, 2005. 423 p.
14. Sokolov S. A. Structural mechanics and metal structures of machines: textbook. Saint Petersburg : Politekhnika, 2011. 450 p.
15. Stepin D., Sokolov M., Kolomoets A. Characteristic defects of metal structures of bridge cranes. TekhNadzor. 2015. No. 11(108). pp. 72–73.
16. Sysoeva V. V. Calculations of stress intensity factors for typical aircraft structures with cracks. Trudy MAI. 2011. No. 45. p. 60.
17. Davidenko A. I., Kiryazev P. N., Vysotskaya N. D. On the determination of stress intensity factors based on the values of principal stresses using the finite element approximation method. Tavricheskiy nauchny obozrevatel. 2016. No. 2(7). pp. 167–170.
18. Bagdadi Sh. Z., Kim E. Ch., Sokolov S. A. Study of stress intensity factors in elements of crane structures. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Podyomno-transportnye mashiny i oborudovaine“. 1999. Iss. 2. pp. 275–280.
19. Matvienko Yu. G. Models and criteria of fracture mechanics. Moscow : Fizmatlit, 2006. 328 p.
20. Stress intensity factors handbook: in 2 volumes. Translated from English. Editor-in-Chief Y. Murakami. Moscow : Mir, 1990. Vol. 1. 448 p.
21. Stress intensity factors handbook: in 2 volumes. Translated from English. Editor-in-Chief Y. Murakami. Moscow : Mir, 1990. Vol. 2. 1016 p.
22. Chen S.-T., Cui C.-G., Li Y.-Q., Zhang Y.-H. Research on the damage detection method on existing girder hoisting machine. Journal of Railway Engineering Society. 2015. Vol. 32, Iss. 11. pp. 73–79.
23. Antsev V. Yu., Tolokonnikov A. S., Vorobev A. V., Sakalo V. I. Methods of determining the margin of cyclic crack resistance of metal structures for hoisting machinery. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 10th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Automation and Control Systems 2016, MEACS 2016; Tomsk; Russian Federation; 27 October 2016 to 29 October 2016. 2016. Vol. 177, Iss. 1. 1 March 2017. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/177/1/012096
24. Seliverstov G. V., Sorokin P. A., Tolokonnikov A. S. Damage of metal structures in zones of stress concentration during elastoplastic deformation. Russian Journal of Heavy Machinery. 2004. Vol. 1. pp. 14–15.
25. Kirnev A. D. Construction cranes and hoisting mechanisms. Handbook. Moscow : Feniks, 2013. 667 p.
26. Braude V. I., Gokhberg M. M., Zvyagin I. E. et al. Handbook of cranes: in 2 volumes. Characteristics of materials and loads. Fundamentals of calculating cranes, their drives and metal structures. Edited by M. M. Gokhberg. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 1988. Vol. 1. 536 p.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back