| ArticleName |
Multiscale modeling of welded pipeline wall failure to
substantiate the leak-before-break criterion |
| ArticleAuthorData |
V. P. Larionov Institute of Physical and Technical Problems of the North, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russia V. V. Lepov, Dr. Eng., Chief Researcher, Full Member of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), e-mail: wisecold@mail.ru
N. I. Golikov, Dr. Eng., Chief Researcher, e-mail: n.i.golikov@mail.ru Ya. M. Andreev, Cand. Eng., Senior Researcher, e-mail: yakovmich@yandex.ru E. S. Lukin, Cand. Eng., Acting Director, e-mail: lukin@iptpn.ysn.ru
Yakutsk Scientific Center, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russia S. O. Semenov, Junior Researcher, e-mail: semens1993@mail.ru L. A. Prokopyev, Researcher, e-mail: l.prokopyev@yandex.ru |
| Abstract |
The basis for a comprehensive system for ensuring the reliability and safety of welded pipelines is the computational and experimental support for monitoring their technical condition using a system-structural approach. The article presents the results of multi-scale modeling of the failure process of a welded pipeline wall made of low-alloy grade 09G2S steel, an analysis of the biaxial stress state, and a computational validation for the leak-before-break criterion, widely used in the industry. The macroscopic level is represented by a computational analysis of the stress-strain state of a longitudinally welded pipe 530×7 mm with a semi-elliptical surface crack in the ANSYS environment. The mesolevel is represented by crack growth modeling within the SmartCrack algorithm using macromodeling parameters. The microlevel is represented by stochastic modeling of the growth of microcracks of an acceptable size according to physical concepts of preferential crack propagation along grain boundaries and defects. The analysis of the results indicates a significant safety margin during the operation of pipelines made of low-alloy high-strength steel 09G2S. However, a significant influence of residual stresses on the stress intensity factor, T-stress, and biaxiality coefficient is revealed. The conducted computational estimates correlate with experimental data from instrumental measurements. The developed method enables a more accurate prediction of the development of crack-like defects and an assessment of the residual service life of structures, including the with leak-before-break criterion. The obtained results are fundamental for the numerical prediction of the stages preceding crack formation and primary leakage based on the percolation criterion. These results are applicable for improving nondestructive testing methods, substantiating the sizes of permissible defects, developing weld repair technologies, and improving the operational safety of metal structures operating in the extreme climatic conditions of northeastern Russia.
This work was performed using the scientific equipment of the Shared Research Center of the Yakutsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The application of multi-level modeling and stochastic calculation of crack growth at the micro level were carried out with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (grant 24-21-20122 https://rscf.ru/project/24-21-20122). |
| References |
1. Lepov V. V., Bisong S. M., Golykh R. N. Multilevel approach to modeling the processes of destruction of materials with a submicrostructure, applicable in Arctic and Subarctic conditions. Prirodnye resursy Arktiki i Subarktiki. 2023. No. 28 (1). pp. 156–171. DOI: 10.31242/2618-9712-2023-28-1-156-171 2. Permyakov P. P. Mathematical modeling of negative permafrost processes. Novosibirsk : SB RAS, 2023. 160 p. 3. Kazantsev A. G., Petrov O. M., Sokov L. M. Influence of residual technological stresses on the opening and stability of through cracks in pipeline elements. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. 2023. No. 6. pp. 51–61. 4. Prokopyev L. A., Golikov N. I., Saraev Yu. N. Crack growth in the field of residual stresses in welded joints of pipelines used in a cold climate. Diagnostics, Resource and Mechanics of materials and structures. 2024. Vol. 5. pp. 159–169. DOI: 10.17804/2410-9908.2024.5.159-169 5. Liu Z., Zhang S., Mao Q., Zheng X. Y. Role of welding residual stress in stainless steel piping with application of the leak-before-break technology. Front. Energy Res. 2023. Vol. 10. 1079476. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1079476 6. Preparata F., Shamos M. Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Translated from English. Moscow : Mir, 1989. 478 p. 7. Voronoi G. F. Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie de formes quadratiques. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 1908. Vol. 134. pp. 198–287. 8. Botvina L. R., Bolotnikov A. I., Levin V. P., Demina Yu. A., Tyutin M. R., Beletsky E. N., Sinev I. O. Features of fracture deformation of stainless steel with different grain sizes. Metally. 2024. No. 6. pp. 75–86. 9. Kmar T., Missaoui M. T., Tabbane N. Optimal C-RAN clustering in 5G context based on memetic algorithm. 19th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA). 2019. pp. 642-647. 10. Saraev Yu. N., Gladkovsky S. V., Golikov N. I. et al. Exploratory research to improve the reliability of critical metal structures operating under extreme loads and low climatic temperatures. High-tech in RSF Siberia projects. Edited by S. G. Psakhie, Yu. P. Sharkeev. Tomsk : Izdatelstvo NTL, 2017. pp. 134–202. 11. Matokhin G. V., Vorobyov A. Yu., Igumenov A. A. Evaluation of the influence of residual welding stresses on the fatigue limit of various zones of welded joints of ferrite-pearlitic steels. Svarka i diagnostika. 2015. No. 1. pp. 32–34. 12. Hiroyuki T. Stress intensity factor analysis and fatigue behavior of a crack in the residual stress field of welding. Journal of ASTM international. 2005. Vol. 2, Iss. 5. pp. 58–68. DOI: 10.1520/JAI12558 13. Ma N., Murakawa H., Ueda Y. Welding deformation and residual stress prevention. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012. 29 p. DOI: 10.1016/C2011-0-06199-9 14. Kopelman L. A. Resistance of welded joints to brittle fracture. Leningrad : Mashinostroenie, 1978. 232 p. 15. Jiang X., Wang W., Xu C., Li J., Lu J. Effect of process parameters on welding residual stress of 316L stainless steel pipe. Materials. 2024. Vol. 17. 2201. DOI: 10.3390/ma17102201 16. Irwin G. R. Fracture of pressure vessels. Material for missile and spacecraft. Mc GrawHill, 1963. pp. 204-229. 17. Tarasov Yu. L. Mathematical simulation of the effect "leakage before destruction". Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2010. Vol. 12, No. 1 (2). pp. 542–547. 18. Alekseev A. T., Alekseev P. V., Loskutov O. D., Tutnov A. A. Approach to probabilistic validation of the leak condition before destruction and exclusion of rupture of the second circuit pipelines of the PWR plant. Atomnaya energiya. 2023. Vol. 135. No. 5-6. pp. 212–218. 19. Bisong M. S., Makharova S. N., Lepov V. V. Heterogeneity estimation of low-cycled steel weld probes. Solid State Phenomena. 2017. Vol. 265 SSP. pp. 873–878. 20. Lebedev M. P., Golokov N. I., Lepov V. V. et al. Reliability of materials, equipment and structures in extremely cold climates. Edited by M. P. Lebedev. Novosibirsk : SB RAS, 2025. 372 pp. 21. Deaconu V. Finite element modelling of residual stress – a powerful tool in the aid of structural integrity assessment of welded structures. 5th International Conference Structural Integrity of Welded Structures (ISCS2007), Timisora, Romania, November 20–21, 2007. Available at: www.ndt.net/article/iscs2007/papers/10.pdf (accessed: 18.12.2025) 22. Wen Sh., Dong H., Zhang Sh. Y., Bannister A., Connelly M. Neutron diffraction measurement of weld residual stresses in an UOE linepipe subjected to mechanical expansion. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2013. DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2013-11257 |