| Название |
Comparison
of blasting-induced seismic impact in non-electric and
electronic initiation |
| Информация об авторе |
Mining Institute, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, Russia
A. V. Verkholantsev, Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, vercholancev@gmail.com D. Yu. Shulakov, Head of a Laboratory, Candidate of Engineering Sciences |
| Реферат |
The article analyzes the operating monitoring data on blasting-induced seismic impact during mining. Since 2022 research fellows of the Natural and Induced Seismicity Laboratory at the Mining Institute UB RAS perform continuous monitoring of blasting-induced seismic impact at an open pit copper–porphyry mine in the Chelyabinsk Region using a network of stationary seismic stations. The aggregated monitoring data make it possible to compare the seismic impacts induced by blasting in case of non-electric and electronic initiation. The main objec tive of the study is to compare the seismic wave amplitudes induced by non-electric and electronic initiation systems. The analysis of over 300 seismograms after 84 large-scale blasts finds out that the electronic system, owing to a better conformity between the actual and project initiation times, enables a statistically significant reduction in the seismic impact magnitude. This allows recommending the electronic initiation systems for the use in the conditions when the seismic load approaches the maximum allowable values and it is required to exercise the maximally precise control of the seismic wave amplitudes. The electronic initiation systems can ensure safety of critical engineering structures and minimize ecological impact. Moreover, in some cases, the electronic initiation systems enable mining operations in infeasible or economically inexpedient areas because of high blasting-induced seismic effect produced on the close-space industrial or civil infrastructure. The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia within the framework of state contract, R&D project registration no. 126012716041-5. |
| Библиографический список |
1. Ekvist B. V. Substantiation and development of methods to enhance seismic safety of short-delay blasting in mines : Dissertation of Doctor of Engineering Sciences. Moscow, 2009. 224 p. 2. Basarnov A. I., Batrakov D. N. Testing of non-electric initiation system devices for response time under polygon conditions. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra VostNII po promyshlennoy i ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2023. No. 1. pp. 27–37. 3. Emanov A. F., Emanov A. A., Fateev A. V., Shevkunova E. V., Vorona U. Yu. et al. Seismic impact of industrial blasts in Western Siberia and induced seismicity. Seismic Instruments. 2019. Vol. 55, No. 4. P. 410–426. 4. Verkholantsev A. V. Prediction method of blasting-induced seismic impact on overground buildings and structures : Dissertation of Candidate of Engineering Sciences. Perm, 2023. 159 p. 5. Dobrynin A. A. Progress of initiating means and systems: The robotization vector of blasting work in the mining industry. Ratsionalnoe osvoenie nedr. 2023. No. 6(74). pp. 60–76. 6. Kondratev S. A., Sysoev A. A., Katanov I. B. Analysis of factory test results of nonelectric detonators “Iskra” for initiation of downhole charges. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2019. No. 6(136). pp. 72–78. 7. Flyagin A. S., Menshchikov P. V., Shemenev V. G. Analysis of the values of the actual deceleration intervals of non-electric initiation systems. Problemy nedropolzovaniya. 2018. No. 2(17). pp. 70–74. 8. Yang R., Scovira D. S. A model for near and farfield blast vibration based on multiple seed waveforms and transfer functions. 36th Conference Explosives and Blasting Technique. Orlando, 2010. Vol. 2. 9. Zhang Z.-X. Rock Fracture and Blasting: Theory and Applications. Oxford : Elsevier, 2016. 505 p. 10. Rostekh created controlled blasting system for high-accuracy mining operations. 2022. Available at: https://rostec.ru/media/news/rostekh-sozdal-sistemu-upravlyaemogovzryva-dlya-sverkhtochnykh-gornykh-rabot/#start (accessed: 24.10.2025). 11. Belin V. A., Gorbonos M. G., Mangush S. K., Ekvist B. V. New technologies of conducting explosive works. MIAB. 2015. No. S1. pp. 87–102. 12. Komarov D. S., Altmaer E. E., Mamaeva M. S. Introduction of modern electronic initiation systems in blasting in mines. Education Quality Improvement, Innovations in Science and Production : International Conference Proceedings. Prokopievsk : Kuzbasskiy gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskiy universitet, 2023. pp. 29–32. 13. Kulikov V. I., Dmitriev A. Yu., Galushko F. I. Seismic action bev with elrctronic initiation. Vzryvnoe delo. 2015. No. 113–70. pp. 366–383. 14. Fadeev A. A., Bagdasaryan O. E. The use of electronic blasting systems to reduce the impact of industrial explosions on the environment and guarded objects near human settlements. Ugol. 2024. No. 12. pp. 122–126. 15. Singh C. P., Agrawal H., Mishra A. K., Singh P. K. Reducing environmental hazards of blasting using electronic detonators in a large opencast coal project—A case study. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels. 2019. Vol. 67, Iss. 7. pp. 345–350. 16. GOST R 52892–2007. Vibration and shock. Vibration of buildings. Measurement of vibration and evaluation o f its effects on structure. Moscow : Standartinform, 2008. 20 p. 17. RB G-05–039–96. Guides on Analysis of Hazard of Emergency Blasts and Determination of Their Mechanical Action Parameters. Moscow, 2000. 45 p. 18. Butyrin P. G., Verkholantsev F. G., Verkholantsev A. V., Shulakov D. Yu. Digital Seismic Logger “Ermak-5”. Experience of Development and Implementation. Seismic Instruments. 2019. Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 117–128. |