Журналы →  Non-ferrous Мetals →  2026 →  №1 →  Назад

MATERIALS SCIENCE
Название Microstructure and mechanical properties of extruded bars manufactured from aluminum chips
DOI 10.17580/nfm.2026.01.04
Автор Belov N. A., Fomin A. V., Cherkasov S. O., Kurbanov K. A.
Информация об авторе

National University of Science and Technology MISIS (Moscow, Russia)

N. A. Belov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Chief Scientist of Metal Forming Department, nikolay-belov.yandex.ru
A. V. Fomin, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Engineer of Metal Forming Department, fominmisis84@mail.ru
S. O. Cherkasov, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Teacher of Metal Forming Department, ch3rkasov@gmail.com
K. A. Kurbanov, Student of Metal Forming Department, koma85@inbox.ru

Реферат

A comparative analysis of the microstructure and mechanical properties of extruded bars produced from chips by solid-phase consolidation was carried out using two aluminum alloys of different alloying systems: the AD31 alloy and the experimental “Calmar” alloy based on the Al – Ca – Mn system. Chips were produced from ingots by turning with equal cutting conditions for both alloys. The dimensions of the chips (both for AD31 and “Calmar” alloys) were: thickness 1–6 mm, length 2–15 mm, height 2–5 mm. It was shown that under identical briquetting conditions, the calculated density of briquettes produced from the “Calmar” alloy is closer to the calculated density of the ingot compared to the AD31 alloy: 89.5% vs. 85.2%. It was established that direct extrusion of briquettes makes it possible to obtain defect-free bars with high strength and ductility, which are not inferior to those produced from ingots under similar conditions. For the “Calmar” alloy, the UTS is 152–179 MPa and the elongation is 15.2–18.2%. The microstructure of bars produced from chips is characterized by a more favorable morphology of eutectic phases and their more uniform distribution compared to bars produced from ingots. This effect is especially pronounced in the experimental alloy, in which the volume fraction of such phases reaches about 10% (compared to about 2% in the AD31 alloy). It was shown that the experimental “Calmar” alloy exhibits superior mechanical properties compared to the AD31 alloy. This indicates that eutectic-type alloys are more promising for solid-phase consolidation than alloys with a low content of secondary phases.

This study was carried out with the financial support of the RSF grant No 25-19-00002 (ingots manufacturing, SEM, mechanical properties) and by the Moscow Polytechnic University within the framework of the grant named after Pyotr Kapitsa (chips, briquettes and extruded bars manufacturing).

Ключевые слова Chips of aluminum alloys, system Al – Ca – Mn, extruded bars, microstructure, mechanical properties
Библиографический список

1. Ashkenazi D. How Aluminum Changed the World: a Metallurgical Revolution Through Technological and Cultural Perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 143. pp. 101–113.
2. Pedneault J., Majeau-Bettez G., Pauliuk S., Margni M. Sector-Specific Scenarios for Future Stocks and Flows of Aluminum: an Analysis Based on Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2022. Vol. 26, Iss. 5. pp. 1728–1746.
3. Sivanur K., Umananda K. V., Pai D. Advanced Materials Used in Automotive Industry—a Review. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 2317. 020032.
4. Zheng K., Politis D. J., Wang L., Lin J. A. Review on Forming Techniques for Manufacturing Lightweight Complex—Shaped Aluminum Panel Components. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture. 2018. Vol. 1, Iss. 2. pp. 55–80.
5. Yang C., Zhang L., Chen Z., Gao Y., Xu Z. Dynamic Material Flow Analysis of Aluminum from Automobiles in China During 2000–2050 for Standardized Recycling Management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022. Vol. 337. 130544.
6. Raabe D., Ponge D., Uggowitzer P. J., Roscher M., Paolantonio M., Liu C., Pogatscher S. et al. Making Sustainable Aluminum by Recycling Scrap: The Science of “Dirty” Alloys. Progress in Materials Science. 2022. Vol. 128. 100947.
7. Arowosola A., Gaustad G. Estimating Increasing Diversity and Dissipative Loss of Critical Metals in the Aluminum Automotive Sector. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2019. Vol. 150. 104382.
8. Capuzzi S., Timelli G. Preparation and Melting of Scrap in Aluminum Recycling: a Review. Metals. 2018. Vol. 8, Iss. 4. 249.
9. Selyanin I. F., Deev V. B., Kukharenko A. V. Resource-Saving and Environment-Saving Production Technologies of Secondary Aluminum Alloys. Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals. 2015. Vol. 56, Iss. 3. pp. 272–276.
10. Schmitz C. Handbook of Aluminium Recycling. Vulkan-Verlag GmbH, 2006. 454 p.
11. Zagirov N. N., Konstantinov I. L., Ivanov E. V., Rogovoy A. A. Investigation of Influence of Morphology of Particles of Graded Waste Chips from Brasses L63 on Properties of Bars and Wires, Obtaining by Metal Forming. Izvestiya. Non-Ferrous Metallurgy. 2014. Iss. 4. pp. 41–45.
12. Palimąka P. Thermal Cleaning and Melting of Fine Aluminium Alloy Chips. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 2020. Vol. 20, Iss. 4. pp. 91–96.
13. Loginov Y. N., Zagirov N. N., Ivanov E. V. Energy Efficiency of Processing Chips From Aluminum and Its Alloys Without The Use of Remelting. Technology of Light Alloys. 2023. Iss. 4. pp. 66–72.
14. Talantov N. V. Physical Foundations of the Process of Cutting, Wearing and Destroying Tools. Moscow: Mashinostroeniye, 1992. 240 p.
15. Zorin N. N. Issues of Mechanics of the Metal Cutting Process. Moscow: Mashgiz, 1956. 367 p.
16. Kafarev G. L., Okenov K. B., Govorukhin V. A. Chip Formation and Quality of the Treated Surface Under Non-Free Cutting. Frunze: Mektep, 1970. 169 p.
17. Plotnikov A. L. Control of Blade Processing Parameters on CNC Machines. Togliati: ONIKS, Volgograd: VolgGTU, 2012. 231 p.
18. GOST 4784–2019. Interstate Standard. Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys. Grades. Moscow: Standartinform, 2019. 31 p.
19. Pat. RU No. 2790117 C1. Int. C22C 21/00. Aluminum-Calcium Alloy. Belov N. A., Tsydenov A. G., Finogeev A. S., Letiagin N. V., Naumova E. A. Appl. 04.05.2022, Publ. 14.02.2023, Bull. No. 5.
20. Makarov G. S. Extrusion Ingots of Aluminium Alloys with Magnesium and Silicon. Moscow: Intermet Engineering, 2011. 528 p.
21. Werinos M., Antrekowitsch H., Ebner T., Prillhofer R., Uggowitzer P. J., Pogatscher S. Hardening of Al – Mg – Si Alloys: Effect of Trace Elements and Prolonged Natural Aging. Materials and Design. 2016. Vol. 107. pp. 257–268.
22. Li X., Pan W., Zhang Z., Liu R. Research on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 6063 Aluminum Alloy Joint Fabricated by Adjustable Ring Laser Welding with Filler Wire. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2026. Vol. 35. pp. 17108–17120.
23. Naumova E., Doroshenko V., Barykin M., Sviridova T., Lyasnikova A., Shurkin P. Hypereutectic Al – Ca – Mn – (Ni) Alloys as Natural Eutectic Composites. Metals. 2021. Vol. 11. 890.

24. Rogachev S. O., Naumova E. A., Sundeev R. V., Tabachkova N. Yu. Structural and Phase Transformations in a New Eutectic Al – Ca - Mn – Fe – Zr – Sc Alloy Induced by High Pressure Torsion. Materials Letters. 2019. Vol. 243. pp. 161–164.
25. Belov N. A., Naumova E. A., Ilyukhin V. D., Doroshenko V. V. Structure and Mechanical Properties of Al – 6% Ca – 1% Fe Alloy Foundry Goods, Obtained by Die Casting. Tsvetnye Metally. 2017. Iss 3. pp. 69–75.
26. Belov N. A., Naumova E. A., Akopyan T. K., Doroshenko V. V. Phase Diagram of the Al – Ca – Fe – Si System and Its Application for the Design of Aluminum Matrix Composites. JOM. 2018. Vol. 70, Iss. 11, pp. 2710–2715.
27. Loginov Y. N., Zagirov N. N., Ivanov E. V. Evaluation of the Level of Hardening of Aluminum Alloy Chips Intended for Subsequent Pressure Treatment. Metal Working and Material Science. 2021. Vol. 23. Iss. 1. pp. 45–55.
28. Fomin A. V., Galkin S. P., Aleshchenko A. S., Gamin Yu. V., Romanenko V. P. Investigation of Metal Flow During Helical Rolling at Different Feed Angles. Non-Ferrous Metals. 2025. Iss. 1. pp. 92–98.
29. Fomin A. V., Romanenko V. P., Aleshchenko A. S., Galkin S. P., Ovchinnikov V. V. Study of Macrostructure and Mechanical Properties Changes During the Upsetting of Hollow Billets Produced by Rotary Piercing Method. Non-Ferrous Metals. 2025. Iss. 1. pp. 85–91.
30. Romanenko V. P., Fomin A. V., Sevastianov A. A., Filippov G. A., Livanova O. V., Ilyukhin D. S. Effect of Screw Piercing on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of a Continuously Cast Blank Made of Wheel Steel. Metallurgist. 2024. Vol. 67. pp. 32–37.
31. Romanenko V. P., Fomin A. V., Romantsev B. A., Filippov G. A., Kriskovich S. M., Nikulin A. N. Influence of Helical Rolling and Piercing on Structure and Mechanical Properties of Billets Made of Wheel Steel of Grade T. CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2025. Vol. 30. pp. 25–29.
32. Mahmoud S. E. D., El-Gamasy R., El-Wahab A. A. A. Mechanical Behavior And Microstructure Of Recycled Al 6082 Chips Consolidated by Hot Extrusion and Their Carbon Footprint. Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14. 6381.
33. GOST 21488–2025. Interstate Standard. Pressed Bars of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. Specifications. Moscow: Standartinform, 2025. 24 p.

Language of full-text английский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад