National University of Science and Technology MISIS (Moscow, Russia)
К. А. Polyakova, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Shape Memory Alloys, Candidate of Technical Sciences, vachiyan@yandex.ru
К. Е. Lukashevich, Junior Researcher of the Laboratory of Shape Memory Alloys, Candidate of Technical Sciences
V. Cherniy, Student
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, RAS (Moscow, Russia)
V. А. Andreev, Leading Researcher at the Laboratory of Plastic Deformation of Metallic Materials (No. 15), Candidate of Technical Sciences
The effect of the size factor on the functional and mechanical properties of hot-drawn Ti–50.8 at.% Ni alloy wire with diameters of 0.6 and 1.2 mm was investigated. The wire diameter was found to have virtually no effect on the sequence or transformation temperatures of the martensitic transformations. However, it significantly influenced the fine substructure, with the smallerdiameter wire exhibiting a higher density of lattice defects. Static tensile tests showed that the 0.6 mm wire possessed superior strength, with an ultimate tensile strength of 1104 MPa and an elongation to failure of 22%, whereas the 1.2 mm wire exhibited an ultimate tensile strength of 999 MPa and an elongation of 41%. Cyclic tensile tests performed under a loading scheme of 5% strain followed by unloading demonstrated that the 1.2 mm wire exhibited more stable superelastic behavior with lower accumulation of residual strain. In both cases, the phase yield stress decreased monotonically during cyclic loading; however, its values remained higher for the 0.6 mm wire, decreasing from 500 to 310 MPa, compared with a decrease from 370 to 270 MPa for the 1.2 mm wire. Functional fatigue tests revealed that the 0.6 mm wire withstood more than 3,600 cycles at a constant maximum strain of 3%, whereas the 1.2 mm wire endured up to 2,500 cycles. No significant difference in the total recoverable strain was observed between the investigated wire diameters. Nevertheless, the higher initial defect density of the finer wire provided enhanced resistance to fatigue failure.
The research was carried out at the expense of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-79-10322, available at: https://rscf.ru/project/24-79-10322/.
1. Dobrzański L. A. et al. Nitinol type alloys general characteristics and applications in endodontics. Processes. 2022. Vol. 10, Iss. 1. pp. 101.
2. Nespoli A. et al. Biomedical NiTi and -Ti alloys: From composition, microstructure and thermo-mechanics to application. Metals. 2022. Vol. 12, Iss. 3. pp. 406.
3. Chen Y., Liou F. Additive manufacturing of Ti – Ni based ternary shape memory alloys. Next Materials. 2026. Vol. 11. pp. 101614.
4. Ryklina E. P., Polyakova K. A., Prokoshkin S. D. Role of nickel content in one-way and two-way shape recovery in binary Ti – Ni alloys. Metals. 2021. Vol. 11, Iss. 1. pp. 119.
5. Frenzel J. et al. Influence of Ni on martensitic phase transformations in NiTi shape memory alloys. Acta Materialia. 2010. Vol. 58, Iss. 9. pp. 3444–3458.
6. Zeldovich V. I., Sobyanina G. A., Rinkevich O. S. Influence of the degree of deformation on the shape memory effects and structure of martensite in titanium nickelide. I. Dilatometric effects of martensitic transformations. Fizika metallov i metallovedeniye. 1996. Vol. 81, No. 3. pp. 107–116.
7. Gall K., Sehitoglu H. The role of texture in tension–compression asymmetry in polycrystalline NiTi. International Journal of Plasticity. 1999. Vol. 15, Iss. 1. pp. 69–92.
8. Jiang D. et al. Bending of pseudoelastic NiTi tubes. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2017. Vol. 124. Р. 192–214.
9. Bechle N. J., Kyriakides S. Localization in NiTi tubes under bending. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2014. Vol. 51, Iss. 5. pp. 967–980.
10. Bažant Z. P. Size effect on structural strength: a review. Archive of applied Mechanics. 1999. Vol. 69, Iss. 9. pp. 703–725.
11. Stolyarov V. V. Mechanical tensile testing of nanostructured materials. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. 2008. Vol. 74, No. 1. pp. 54–57.
12. Suresh S. Fatigue of materials. Cambridge university press, 1998. 679 p.
13. Pelleg J. Mechanical properties of materials. (Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, 190). Springer Science and Business Media, 2012. 648 p.
14. Greer J. R., Oliver W. C., Nix W. D. Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients. Acta Materialia. 2005. Vol. 53, Iss. 6. pp. 1821–1830.
15. Ghosh, P. & Chokshi, A. H. Size effects on strength in the transition from single-to-polycrystalline behavior. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2015. Vol. 46. pp. 5671–5684.
16. Miyazaki S., Shibata K., Fujita H. Effect of specimen thickness on mechanical properties of polycrystalline aggregates with various grain sizes. Acta Metallurgica. 1979. Vol. 27, Iss. 5. pp. 855–862.
17. Rinaldi A. et al. Sample-size effects in the yield behavior of nanocrystalline nickel. Acta Materialia. 2008. Vol. 56, Iss. 3. pp. 511–517.
18. Keller C., Hug E., Feaugas X. Microstructural size effects on mechanical properties of high purity nickel. International Journal of Plasticity. 2011. Vol. 27, Iss. 4. pp. 635–654.
19. Bin G. U. O. et al. Effects of specimen size on flow stress of micro rod specimen. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2009. Vol. 19, Iss. 2. pp. s511–s515.
20. Molotnikov A. et al. Size effect on the tensile strength of fine-grained copper. Scripta Materialia. 2008. Vol. 59, Iss. 11. pp. 1182–1185.
21. Chen Y., Kraft O. & Walter M. Size effects in thin coarse-grained gold microwires under tensile and torsional loading. Acta Mater. 2015. Vol. 87. pp. 78–85.
22. Ryklina E. P., Polyakova K. A., Resnina N. N. Role of Structural Heredity in Aging-Induced Microstructure and Transformation Behavior in Ni-rich Titanium Nickelide. Shape Memory and Superelasticity. 2022. Vol. 8. pp. 200–214.
23. Monogenov A. N. et al. Effect of the size factor on the strength and plastic properties, the shape memory effect, and the superelasticity of TiNi-based thin filaments. Russian Metallurgy (Metally). 2020. Vol. 2020, Iss. 10. pp. 1116–1121.
24. Gyunter V. E., Ovcharenko V. V., Klopotov A. A. Influence of size factor on martensite transformations and shape memory effects in TiNi based alloys. Technical Physics Letters. 2000. Vol. 26, Iss. 3. pp. 182–183.
25. Gunther S. V., Monogenov A. N., Vetrova A. V., Kovaleva M. A. Influence of the size factor of titanium nickelide alloy wire on structural characteristics and mechanical properties. Tsvetnye Metally. 2023. Vol. 12. pp. 63–69.
26. Polyakova K. et al. Comparative Studies of Stress-Temperature Behavior and Aging Efficiency of Ni50.8Ti Alloy with Various Virgin Structures. Shape Memory and Superelasticity. 2026. Vol. 12. pp. 194–204.
27. Lukashevisch K. et al. Effect of a Four-Caliber Longitudinal Rolling on Microstructure, Mechanical, and Functional Properties of Superelastic Ti – Zr – Nb Alloy for Biomedical Application. Shape Memory and Superelasticity. 2025. Vol. 11, Iss. 3. pp. 619–634.
28. Muradyan A. et al. Microstructure and properties of superelastic Ti – 18Zr – 15Nb alloy subjected to combination of moderate/severe cold drawing and post-deformation annealing. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2025. Vol. 1010. pp. 177370.
29. Honarvar M. et al. Size effect on the critical stress of Nitinol wires. Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems. 2013. DOI: 10.1115/SMASIS2013-3157.
30. Norwich D. W., Fasching A. A study of the effect of diameter on the fatigue properties of NiTi wire. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2009. Vol. 18, Iss. 5. pp. 558–562.
31. Yu H. et al. Effect of Cold Drawing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 410 Martensite Stainless Steel Wire. Chinese Materials Conference. Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2017. pp. 477–485.
32. Eggeler G. et al. Structural and functional fatigue of NiTi shape memory alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2004. Vol. 378, Iss. 1–2. pp. 24–33.
33. Saleeb A. F. et al. The cyclic and evolutionary response to approach the attraction loops under stress controlled isothermal conditions for a multimechanism based multi-axial SMA model. Mechanics of Materials. 2013. Vol. 63. pp. 21–47.
34. Pelton A. R. et al. Pre-strain and mean strain effects on the fatigue behavior of superelastic nitinol medical devices. Shape Memory and Superelasticity. 2022. Vol. 8, Iss. 2. pp. 64–84.
35. Chu K., Sun Q. Reducing functional fatigue, transition stress and hysteresis of NiTi micropillars by one-step overstressed plastic deformation. Scripta materialia. 2021. Vol. 201, Iss.7. pp. 113958.


