METAL PROCESSING
ArticleName
Deformation resistance of 1420 alloy in cast and wrought conditions under compression and tension
DOI
10.17580/tsm.2026.08.08
ArticleAuthors
Salikhianov D. R., Salikhianova Е. I., Razinkin А. V., Мaltseva Т. V., Оvsyannikov B. V.
ArticleAuthorsData

Institute of New Materials and Technologies of the Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin (Yekaterinburg, Russia)1 ; Institute of Engineering Science named after E. S. Gorkunov of the Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (Yekaterinburg, Russia)2

D. R. Salikhianov*, Associate Professor of the Department of Metals Pressure Treatment1, Researcher of the Sector of New Materials and Technologies2, Candidate of Technical Sciences, d.r.salikhianov@urfu.ru
Е. I. Salikhianova, Associate Professor of the Department of Metals Pressure Treatment1, Researcher of the Youth Laboratory of Materials Technology2, Candidate of Technical Sciences

 

JSC Kamensk-Uralsky Metallurgical Works (Kamensk-Uralsky, Russia)
А. V. Razinkin, Director of Technology, Candidate of Technical Sciences
Т. V. Мaltseva, Deputy Director of Technology, Candidate of Technical Sciences
B. V. Оvsyannikov, Academic Secretary, Candidate of Technical Sciences

 

*Corresponding author

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an investigation into the deformation resistance of the 1420 aluminum-lithium alloy in both cast and wrought conditions over a wide range of rates (0.01-1 s–1) and within the hot treatment temperature range of 360–400 °C. Flow curves were obtained under compression using the plastometric unit of the Institute of Engineering Science, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences at strain rates of 0.1-1 s–1, and under tension using a Test Systems universal testing unit at strain rates of 0.01-0.1 s–1. The effects of temperature, strain, and strain rate on the deformation resistance of the 1420 alloy in both structural conditions were analyzed. To evaluate the influence of the testing method, the flow curves obtained under compression and tension at a strain rate of 0.1 s–1 were compared. For a proper comparison of the deformation resistance curves, the friction factor was determined, and the compression flow curves were corrected to compensate for frictional losses. The observed differences were attributed to the effect of the stress state on the deformation behavior of the alloy. The influence of the initial condition of the 1420 alloy (cast and wrought) on deformation resistance and ductility was also evaluated. It was established that the alloy structure has a significant effect on both the flow curves and the ductility.
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Project No. FEUZ-2026-0013).

keywords
Aluminum-lithium alloy, 1420 alloy, deformation resistance, hardening curves, compression test, tensile test, plastometer
References

1. Grushko О. Е., Оvsyannikov B. V., Оvchinnikov V. V. Aluminum lithium alloys : metallurgy, welding and materials science. Moscow : Nauka, 2014. 296 p.
2. Burkin S. P., Babailov N. А., Оvsyannikov B. V. Resistance of deformation of Al and Mg alloys : reference book. Yekaterinburg : UrFU, 2010. 344 p.
3. Мaltseva Т. V., Оzerets N. N., Levina А. V., Ishina Е. А. Non-ferrous metals : study guide. Yekaterinburg : UrFU, 2019. 176 p.
4. Dursun T., Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft Aluminium Alloys. Materials and Design. 2014. Vol. 56. pp. 862–871.
5. Xu X., Hao M., Chen J. et al. Influence of microstructural and crystal lographic inhomogeneity on tensile anisotropy in thick-section Al – Li – Cu – Mg plates. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2022. Vol. 829. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142135
6. Pesin A.M., Razinkin A.V., Zamaraev V. A. et al. Comparative analysis of the deformation resistance of aluminum–lithium alloy 1441 during compression and torsion tests. Teoriya i tekhnologiya metallurgicheskogo proizvodstva. 2024. No. 3. pp. 14–20.
7. Koryagin Yu. D., Krainov V. I. Structure and properties of aluminum alloy 1421 subjected to plastic deformation and heat treatment. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya Metallurgiya. 2017. Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 64–72.
8. Moskvichev E. N., Skripnyak V. A., Skripnyak V. V. et al. Influence of structure to plastic deformation resistance of aluminum alloy 1560 after groove pressing treatment. Letters on materials. 2016. Vol. 6, Iss. 2. pp. 141–145.
9. Dovzhenko N. N., Rushchits S. V., Dovzhenko I. N., Yurev P. O. Understanding the behaviour of aluminium alloy Р-1580 sparingly doped with scandium under hot deformation. Tsvetnye Metally. 2019. No. 9. pp. 80–86.
10. Nguyen S. Z., Gamin Yu. V., Akopyan T. K., Kin T. Yu. Deformation behavior and microstructure of the Al – 6Mg – 0.3Sc aluminum alloy under hot deformation conditions. Fizika metallov i metallovedeniye. 2022. Vol. 123, No. 11. pp. 1248–1256.
11. Pesin A. M., Razinkin A. V., Zamaraev V. A., Pustovoytov D. O. Deformation behavior of 1441 aluminum-lithium alloy in the hot rolling temperature range. Tsvetnye Metally. 2025. No. 8. pp. 66–72.
12. Мiklyaev P. G. Mechanical properties of light alloys at the temperatures and pressure treatment rates : reference book. Moscow : Мetallurgiya, 1994. 279 p.
13. Avramovic-Cingara G., McQueen H. J., Perovic D. D. Comparison of torsion and compression constitutive analyses for elevated temperature deformation of Al – Li – Cu – Mn alloy. Materials Science and Technology. 2003. Vol. 19, Iss. 1. pp. 11–19.
14. Gontarz A. Comparative study of the flow characteristics of AlCu2SiMn alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2003. Vol. 138. pp. 156–162.
15. GOST 1 90048–90. Aluminum deformable alloys. Grades. Introduced: 01.02.1991.
16. Potapov A. I., Dvoynikov D. A., Salikhianov D. R. Peculiarities of determining the deformation resistance of metals under controlled loading. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. 2015. Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 52–56.
17. Yu. N. Loginov, S. V. Gladkovskii, A. I. Potapov et al. Investigation into the Deformation Resistance of Polycrystalline Iridium. Izvestiya Non-Ferrous Metallurgy. 2015. Vol. 56, Iss. 5. pp. 532–539.
18. Obiko J. Friction correction of flow stress-strain curve in the upsetting process. IOP SciNotes. 2021. Vol. 2. DOI: 10.1088/2633-1357/abdd96
19. Luan J., C. Sun, Li X., Zhang Q. Constitutive model for AZ31 magnesium alloy based on isothermal compression test. Materials Science and Technology. 2014. Vol. 30, Iss. 2. pp. 211–219.
20. Evans R. W., Scharning P. J. Axisymmetric compression test and hot working properties of alloys. Materials Science and Technology. 2001. Vol. 17, Iss. 8. pp. 995–1004.
21. Kamantsev I. S., Putilova E. A., Trokhacheva A. E. et al. Investigation of the influence of recrystallization annealing modes on the structure and properties of deformed aluminum alloy 2024. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2024. Vol. 65. pp. 109–113.
22. Wang Y., Zhang Z., We R. et al. Ambient-temperature mechanical properties of isochronally aged 1420–ScZr aluminum alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2019. Vol. 745. pp. 411–419.
23. Yusheng C., Ziyong Z., Sue L., Wei K. The corrosion behaviors and mechanism of 1420 Al – Li alloy. Scripta Materialia. 1996. Vol. 34, Iss. 5. pp. 781–796.

Language of full-text
russian
Full content

Back