BENEFICIATION TECHNOLOGY
ArticleName
Development of iron ore beneficiation technology with high sulfur content. Part 1. Development of iron ore beneficiation technology with high sulfur content for sulfur removal from stage III magnetic separation concentrate
DOI
10.17580/or.2026.04.01
ArticleAuthors
Gapeeva A. E., Taranov V. A., Tasina T. I., Aksenova G. Ya.
ArticleAuthorsData

JSC “Mekhanobr Engineering” (St. Petersburg, Russia)

Gapeeva A. E., Researcher, gapeeva.ae@mekhanobr.com
Taranov V. A., Candidate of Technical Sciences, Head of Technological Research Department, taranov@mekhanobr.com
Tasina T. I., Senior Researcher, Deputy Head of Technological Research Department, science@mekhanobr.com
Aksenova G. Ya., Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Leading Researcher, aksenova.gy@mekhanobr.com

Abstract

The article presents the results of research on the development of a beneficiation technology for iron ore with a high sulfur content. The work was carried out on a representative sample of iron ore containing 39.6% total iron and 2.63% total sulfur. The relevance of the study was driven by the need to obtain a high-quality concentrate with a low sulfur content. The concentrate obtained after the third stage of wet magnetic separation contained 68% total iron and 3.2% total sulfur. The high sulfur content is attributed to the presence of iron sulfide minerals, namely pyrite and a significant amount of monoclinic pyrrhotite. Monoclinic pyrrhotite exhibits high magnetic susceptibility, which results in the formation of magnetic floccules consisting of finer magnetite particles around the pyrrhotite grains. To reduce the sulfur content in the magnetic product of the third-stage wet magnetic separation, flotation tests were carried out. The results of experiments on the selection of a reagent regime for pyrrhotite flotation are presented, and a comparison is made between the results obtained without and with the use of a scrubbing operation. It was found that the combination of the scrubbing operation together with sodium silicate makes it possible to reduce the sulfur content in the underflow product to 0.28% with a sulfur recovery of 91.73% to the froth product. The iron content in the concentrate meets the high standards of metallurgical production (69.0%), ensuring high quality of the feed material for smelting with minimal impurities, since an elevated sulfur content leads to a deterioration in the mechanical properties of pellets. Such a high-quality magnetite concentrate is primarily used in ferrous metallurgy for the production of high-grade steels and cast irons.

keywords
Iron ore, magnetite, pyrrhotite, pyrrhotite flotation, reverse sulfide flotation, scrubbing, magnetic separation, magnetite concentrate
References

1. Pelevin A. E. Iron ore beneficiation technologies in Russia and ways to improve their efficiency. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 256. pp. 579–592.
2. Bersenev I. S., Evstyugin S. N., Podkovyrkin E. A., Zhukov Yu. S., Shcheglov V. N. Features of Desulfurization of Iron Ore Pellets from High-Sulfur Concentrates in a Shifting Layer. Creative Heritage of V. E. Grum-Grzhimailo: Past, Present, and Future: Collection of Papers from the International Scientific and Practical Conference (March 27–29, 2014, Yekaterinburg). Pt. 1. Yekaterinburg: UrFU, 2014. pp. 78–81.
3. Tang X., Chen Y. A review of flotation and selective separation of pyrrhotite: a perspective from crystal structures. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2022. Vol. 32, Iss. 4. pp. 847–863.
4. Rezvani A., Raji F., Liu Q., Peng Y. Identification and quantification of pyrrhotite superstructures in base metal sulfide ore samples: a critical review. Minerals Engineering. 2024. Vol. 218, Iss. 2. 108975.
5. Haghmohamadipasan R., Vazifeh Mehrabani J., Pourghahramani P. An Investigation on Removing Sulfur from Hamadan Magnetite Concentrate. Journal of Mineral Resources Engineering. 2020. Vol. 5, Iss. 18. pp. 95–110.
6. Arvidson B., Klemetti M., Knuutinen T., Kuusisto M., Man Y. T., Hughes-Narborough C. Flotation of pyrrhotite to produce magnetite concentrates with a sulphur level below 0.05% w/w. Journal of Minerals Engineering. Vol. 50-51. 2013. pp. 4–12.
7. Armando Correa de Araujo, Matthias R. Flotation of pyrrhotite from magnetite ores – a Kazakh case study. 42nd ABM Ironmaking Seminar, 6th International Congress on the Science and Technology of Ironmaking – ICSTI, 42nd International Meeting on Ironmaking and 13th International Symposium on Iron Ore (October 14th to 18th, 2012, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). 2012. pp. 1928–1945.
8. Chanturia E. L., Minenko V. G. Promising methods for increasing the extraction of iron minerals and the quality of iron ore concentrate. Innovative Processes of Complex Processing of Natural and Technogenic Mineral Raw Materials: Proceedings of the International Conference (Plaksin Readings – 2020). Apatity: FIC KSC RAS, 2020. pp. 56–60.
9. Zhang X., Gu X., Han Y., Parra-Álvarez N., Claremboux V., Kawatra S. K. Flotation of iron ores: a review. Journal of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2021. Vol. 42, Iss. 18. pp. 184–212.
10. Xiaohui Zeng, Xin Hu, Zishuai Liu, Gan Wan. Flotation separation of pyrrhotite from magnetite using sodium fluosilicate (Na2SiF6) as a selective activator. Journal Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 2025. Vol. 61, Iss. 4. 207418.
11. Nakhaei F., Irannajad M., Mohammadnejad S., Hajizadeh Omran A. Sulfur content reduction of iron concentrate by reverse flotation. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2023. Vol. 45, Iss. 3. pp. 9552–9568.
12. Kameneva A. A., Rukhlenko E. D. Ways to improve the quality of magnetite concentrate at the Kovdorsky GOK OJSC. Obogashchenie Rud. 2002. No. 1. pp. 27–31.

Language of full-text
russian
Full content

Back