Журналы →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2019 →  №1 →  Назад

EQUIPMENT
Название Influence of the bowl shape on Itomak centrifugal concentrator performance
DOI 10.17580/or.2019.01.07
Автор Vasilyev A. M., Kuskov V. B.
Информация об авторе

Saint Petersburg Mining University (St. Petersburg, Russia):
Vasilyev A. M., Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, vasilievanton@mail.ru
Kuskov V. B., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, opiopi@spmi.ru

Реферат

This article outlines the results of a study of the influence of the key factors on the efficiency of material separation in Itomak KG-0.1 centrifugal concentrators. Two different separation bowls were used to study the effects of variations in loosening water consumption and in the content of the heavy component in the feed. The respective separation efficiency was evaluated using the Hancock—Luiken criterion. The initial material was represented by an artificial mixture consisting of quartz sand and narrow grades of granular ferrosilicon. The studies use the second-order rotatable design method. This method is well-established for studying the processes of separation and optimization of concentrating equipment performing physical separation of ores, in particular, gravity concentration equipment. Based on the experimental data obtained, patterns of the influence of the key factors on the particle separation efficiency in a centrifugal field were established. These studies enabled evaluating the effects of the key factors to ensure improved separation of fine-grained ores and materials in laboratory investigations and in industrial environments. This paper provides recommendations on the use of various separation bowls for Itomak KG-0.1 centrifugal concentrators in the processing of fine-grained materials.

Ключевые слова Gravity concentration, centrifugal concentrator, Itomak, bowl shape, loosening water, second-order rotatable design
Библиографический список

1. Aleksandrova T., Nikolaeva N., Lieberwirth, H., Aleksandrov A. Selective desintegration and concentration: theory and practice. E3S Web of Conf. Vol. 56, 2018. 7th International scientific conference «Problems of complex development of georesources» (PCDG 2018). Khabarovsk, September 25–27, 2018. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20185603001.
2. Korchevenkov S., Aleksandrova T. Investigation of the influence a morphologic characteristics of the noble metal particles on gravity efficiency devices. International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference surveying geology and mining ecology management (SGEM 2018), Albena, Bulgaria, July 2–8, 2018. Vol. 18, Iss. 1.4. pp. 99–104. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2018/1.4/S04.013.
3. Korchevenkov S. A, Aleksandrova T. N. Preparation of standard iron concentrates from non-traditional forms of raw material using a pulsed magnetic field. Metallurgist. 2017. Vol. 61, Iss. 5-6. pp. 375-381. DOI: 10.1007/s11015-017-0503-z.
4.   Bogdanovich A. V., Petrov S. V. Comparative tests of centrifugal concentrators of various types. Obogashchenie Rud. 2001. No. 3. pp. 38–41.
5.  Lopatin A. G. Centrifugal enrichment of ores and sands. Moscow: Nedra. 1987. pp. 87–135.
6.  Bogdanovich A. V., Fedotov K. V. The main trends in the development of equipment and technology of gravitational enrichment of sands and finely disseminated ores. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2007. No. 2. pp. 51–57.
7. Bocharov V. A, Gurikov A. V., Gurikov V. V. Analysis of gold-containing products separation processes in Knelson and Falcon SB concentrators. Obogashchenie Rud. 2002. No. 2. pp. 17-21.
8.  Algebraistova N. K., Makshanin A. V., Burdakova E. A, Markova A. S. Ore dressing of precious metal bearing rocks in centrifugal machines. Tsvetnye Metally. 2017. No. 1. pp. 18–22.
9. Afanasenko S. I. What are the advantages of russian Itomak concentrators. Scientific basis and practice of ore and technogenic raw materials processing: Proc. of XXIII Intern. sc.-tech. conf. Ekaterinburg: Fort Dialog-Iset’, 2018. pp. 272–276.
10.  Greenwood M., Langlois R., Waters K. E. The potential for dry processing using a Knelson сoncentrator. Minerals Engineering. 2013. Vol. 45. pp. 44–46.
11.  Schriner D., Anderson C. Centrifugal concentration of rare earth minerals from calcitic gangue. Journal of Metallurgical Engineering. 2015. Vol. 4. pp. 69–77.
12.   Kokkilic O., Langlois R., Waters K. E. A design of experiments investigation into dry separation using a Knelson concentrator. Minerals Engineering. 2015. Vol. 72. pp. 73–86.
13. Altun N. E., Sakuhuni G., Klein B. The use of continuous centrifugal gravity concentration in grinding circuit. Modified approach for improved metallurgical performance and reduced grinding requirements. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 2015. Vol. 51(1). pp. 115-126. DOI: 10.5277/ ppmp150111.
14.   Summary of gold plants and processes. Gold Ore Processing: Project Development and Operations. Ser. Developments in Mineral Processing. Vol. 15, Chap. 54. 2nd ed. Ed. Adams M. D. Elsevier Science, 2016. pp. 961–984.
15.   Bogdanovich A. V, Vasilyev A. M. Study of gravity separators work for fine-grained materials enrichment. Obogashchenie Rud. 2005. No. 1. pp. 12–15.
16.  Nalimov V. V, Chernova N. A. Statistical methods for planning extreme experiments. Moscow: Nauka, 1965. 340 p.
17.  Kuskov V B., Vasilyev A. M. Regularities of finegrained materials separation process on concentrating table. Obogashchenie Rud. 2017. No. 3. pp. 63-68.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад